Another reason not to get close to such a device.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/ ... -nits.html
Hmmm.... Sounds like a good reason NOT to borrow other people's phones!Another reason not to get close to such a device.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/ ... -nits.html
?Hmmm.... Sounds like a good reason NOT to borrow other people's phones!Another reason not to get close to such a device.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/ ... -nits.html
Can't be too careful.?Hmmm.... Sounds like a good reason NOT to borrow other people's phones!Another reason not to get close to such a device.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/ ... -nits.html
I thought the issue was people leaning close together so they all fit into the photo, and head lice jumping from person to pefson
Indeed! Yet the article mentions sharing of head-touching objects as an alternative vector for transmission. For example, a louse carrier might hold a phone against their head; a louse might falls or climbs on to the phone in some nook or cranny; then another person might borrows the phone and pick up said louse.?Hmmm.... Sounds like a good reason NOT to borrow other people's phones!Another reason not to get close to such a device.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/ ... -nits.html
I thought the issue was people leaning close together so they all fit into the photo, and head lice jumping from person to pefson
But surely if you believe all the other daIly mail stories the lice would be instantly killed by the radiation leaking from these devices - unless they become like the spider whose bite created Spiderman.Indeed! Yet the article mentions sharing of head-touching objects as an alternative vector for transmission. For example, a louse carrier might hold a phone against their head; a louse might falls or climbs on to the phone in some nook or cranny; then another person might borrows the phone and pick up said louse.?Hmmm.... Sounds like a good reason NOT to borrow other people's phones!
I thought the issue was people leaning close together so they all fit into the photo, and head lice jumping from person to pefson
It would be interesting to correlate louse transmission rates as a function of person-to-person greeting practices. Those countries that practice a-kiss-on-the-cheek would presumably have the greatest problem with lice.
Quite so! The only other shocking secret remedy is to eat chlorinated chicken with some GMO corn.But surely if you believe all the other daIly mail stories the lice would be instantly killed by the radiation leaking from these devices - unless they become like the spider whose bite created Spiderman.Indeed! Yet the article mentions sharing of head-touching objects as an alternative vector for transmission. For example, a louse carrier might hold a phone against their head; a louse might falls or climbs on to the phone in some nook or cranny; then another person might borrows the phone and pick up said louse.?
I thought the issue was people leaning close together so they all fit into the photo, and head lice jumping from person to pefson
It would be interesting to correlate louse transmission rates as a function of person-to-person greeting practices. Those countries that practice a-kiss-on-the-cheek would presumably have the greatest problem with lice.
Are we about to see a wave of louse man superheroes?
Herr KartoffelKopf (wholly lacking any superpowers!)
That won't be happening any time soon by the looks of it (at the 0.005% percentile;))Quite so! The only other shocking secret remedy is to eat chlorinated chicken with some GMO corn.But surely if you believe all the other daIly mail stories the lice would be instantly killed by the radiation leaking from these devices - unless they become like the spider whose bite created Spiderman.Indeed! Yet the article mentions sharing of head-touching objects as an alternative vector for transmission. For example, a louse carrier might hold a phone against their head; a louse might falls or climbs on to the phone in some nook or cranny; then another person might borrows the phone and pick up said louse.
It would be interesting to correlate louse transmission rates as a function of person-to-person greeting practices. Those countries that practice a-kiss-on-the-cheek would presumably have the greatest problem with lice.
Are we about to see a wave of louse man superheroes?
Herr KartoffelKopf (wholly lacking any superpowers!)
http://www.rte.ie/news/2016/0830/812819 ... x-ireland/state of the art Apple tax wizardry... Double Irish with a Dutch sandwich
It sounds like Apple negotiated a contract with the Irish government which was subsequently ruled illegal under EU law. I'd think that Apple could now sue the Irish government for damages and misrepresentation -- they fraudulently lured Apple to Ireland.http://www.rte.ie/news/2016/0830/812819 ... x-ireland/state of the art Apple tax wizardry... Double Irish with a Dutch sandwich
BTW ever tried 'broodje paling'?
http://www.tolhuysaandezaan.nl/wp-conte ... Paling.jpg
Talk is cheap.It sounds like Apple negotiated a contract with the Irish government which was subsequently ruled illegal under EU law. I'd think that Apple could now sue the Irish government for damages and misrepresentation -- they fraudulently lured Apple to Ireland.http://www.rte.ie/news/2016/0830/812819 ... x-ireland/state of the art Apple tax wizardry... Double Irish with a Dutch sandwich
BTW ever tried 'broodje paling'?
http://www.tolhuysaandezaan.nl/wp-conte ... Paling.jpg
Should companies be held to higher legal standards than governments?
Very true!Talk is cheap.It sounds like Apple negotiated a contract with the Irish government which was subsequently ruled illegal under EU law. I'd think that Apple could now sue the Irish government for damages and misrepresentation -- they fraudulently lured Apple to Ireland.http://www.rte.ie/news/2016/0830/812819 ... x-ireland/
BTW ever tried 'broodje paling'?
http://www.tolhuysaandezaan.nl/wp-conte ... Paling.jpg
Should companies be held to higher legal standards than governments?
The next step is to take the case to CJEU in Kirschberg. After all, we're talking about European law here. It transcends both national and corporate law.
Maybe dig into some details about the case before we can proceed.Very true!Talk is cheap.It sounds like Apple negotiated a contract with the Irish government which was subsequently ruled illegal under EU law. I'd think that Apple could now sue the Irish government for damages and misrepresentation -- they fraudulently lured Apple to Ireland.
Should companies be held to higher legal standards than governments?
The next step is to take the case to CJEU in Kirschberg. After all, we're talking about European law here. It transcends both national and corporate law.
And if two parties negotiate a contract that is later ruled illegal, who is to be held accountable? One would assume that a government that is part of the EU would be expected to understand EU law better than would a foreign company.