"it can turn into mass, which is the same as gravity, mass is gravity and gravity is mass"
No. Gravity is one side of the Einstein equation (curvature tensor), mass is on the other (stress-energy tensor).
Off course they have a very different mass measure. Modern physics mass definition (unknown to themselves) is at a deeper level collision frequency ratio as shown in my paper, they do not have collision time/space (collision space-time) in their mass model and must therefore get gravity in as something else. Why they never will get unified theory.
This is the whole point, they have missed out on one important part of mass. GR in its current form can never be unified, without understanding mass is also collision time. The idea of point-particles is nonsense, something Newton naturally with his correct view of light particles never would have accepted!
And no reason to look for unified theory anymore. It is done now! Sure details to do, leave it for the tailors!
The wave-particle duality of mass simply proves they misses out the pure mass, the collision time in their mass. Sure there is wave-particle duality in my theory also (void-particle duality actually) but at the deepest level where we have gravity the wave-particle duality collapses . This is the Planck scale, that again is Lorentz symmetry break down and Heisenberg uncertainty break down.
Your saying just prove u did not bother read my paper before u attack it, or u do not understand it, I would think a combination!
Modern physics has missed out off one of two important aspects of mass, their theories get clouded in complexity and buzzwords, not needed at all if one understand the depth of reality!