SERVING THE QUANTITATIVE FINANCE COMMUNITY

 
User avatar
EStealth
Topic Author
Posts: 48
Joined: July 9th, 2004, 6:56 pm

"Equation"

July 16th, 2004, 4:22 pm

"For Step 1. you have proven that x<1, but "Obviously, that limit is b^(1/b)" seams to be weak. You'd probably should show that there is such n1 that f(n1) is in \epsilon range from e and for any n2>n1 and so on..."I take that back. It was at some point earlier. I just wanted you not to use something like f(n+1) = x^f(n), but there is no point not to.So if b is in (0,e] then the solution is b^1/b. (e, infty) no solution thus the original equation has no solution. Cool.Thanks
 
User avatar
alexandreC
Posts: 678
Joined: June 9th, 2004, 11:35 pm

"Equation"

July 16th, 2004, 10:10 pm

(hang on a second... final draft being prepared.)
Last edited by alexandreC on July 16th, 2004, 10:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
User avatar
Mircea
Posts: 19
Joined: July 9th, 2004, 6:04 pm

"Equation"

July 17th, 2004, 1:03 am

alexandreC,I guess the confusion comes from the fact that (a^b^c)^d = a^(b^c*d) and not a^b^c^d. (Hint: a^b^c^d = a^(b^(c^d)) )So if you take the power 1/x on both sides at best you get 2^(1/x) = 2^(1/x) which is OK but proves nothing.
 
User avatar
alexandreC
Posts: 678
Joined: June 9th, 2004, 11:35 pm

"Equation"

July 17th, 2004, 10:49 am

Last edited by alexandreC on July 24th, 2004, 10:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
User avatar
Mircea
Posts: 19
Joined: July 9th, 2004, 6:04 pm

"Equation"

July 20th, 2004, 2:06 am

alexanderC,I have a proble with the line 3. Do I read well a^(1/b)=a^(-b)? Then for a=b=2 we will have sqrt(2)=1/4!!!. Cool, but wrong.
 
User avatar
mat
Posts: 15
Joined: January 15th, 2002, 11:22 am

"Equation"

July 26th, 2004, 9:27 pm

Hi, if I can helpLet's try to go back to the original problemIf the equation is the following :x^x^x = 2, then the solution is clearly 2^(1/2)If the equation is x^x^x^x^x^x^x^x^x^x^x^x^x^x^x^x^x^x^....until infinity = 2, I will say that there is in theory no solution to the problem.For me,if 0<x<1, it will converge to 1if x=1, the solution is obviously 1if x>1, it will divergeIF it can be helpful
 
User avatar
Mircea
Posts: 19
Joined: July 9th, 2004, 6:04 pm

"Equation"

July 26th, 2004, 9:55 pm

mat,For me = 1.76084 not 2!!!A proof for this problem was posted on July 15. Dose anybody know a shorter one?
 
User avatar
Merlin81
Posts: 59
Joined: March 25th, 2003, 8:20 am

"Equation"

July 27th, 2004, 8:39 am

I agree with Mircea's last post:Thats my 0.01.
ABOUT WILMOTT

PW by JB

Wilmott.com has been "Serving the Quantitative Finance Community" since 2001. Continued...


Twitter LinkedIn Instagram

JOBS BOARD

JOBS BOARD

Looking for a quant job, risk, algo trading,...? Browse jobs here...


GZIP: On