Funny, but I have a photographic memory. Faces I never forget.
It's the names I can't remember.
Not really. Some did not buy into the euphoria based on the hype and waffle. CS and maths don't mix well..Maybe they're being slightly bored with receiving condescending one-liners as replies?
Seems I am not alone. And I am talking about PDE-ML.I usually respond to specific points that I understand. The problem is, often your points are vague and hard to understand. And you don't seem open to learning things. At least that's my impression.
True; but ML-PDE js the talk of the town in the quant sphere.Fair point about the PDEs. But there's more to ML than naive attempts at PDE solving.
That's interesting (as well a Farid's post. At the moment I am porting C++ code to Python (ADE, CN, MOL) as an aid to understanding PDE, with a focus on maintainabiliy and extendibiliity (read; design pattern).What do you think about this work? https://www.pnas.org/content/116/31/15344