Interesting

How big is that class of problems? and how have they measured 'get by'?

In other words, what are the criteria for using these data types?

Statistics: Posted by Cuchulainn — April 16th, 2018, 9:03 am

]]>

Statistics: Posted by ExSan — April 15th, 2018, 10:11 pm

]]>

great curve fitting functions consistent with a large set of observations do not necessary mean the model gives deep insight about the depth of reality.

probabilities are only an illusion, at the bottom of the rabbit hole probabilities can not really be distinguished from space and time.

Statistics: Posted by Collector — April 8th, 2018, 10:47 pm

]]>

I am just trying to look more closely at Wigner, anyone knowing exactly what is going on in the quasi distribution. Exactly why the Fake probabilities?

.

Statistics: Posted by Collector — April 8th, 2018, 6:14 pm

]]>

"Here, we prove that all previous negative temperature claims and their implications are invalid as they arise from the use of an entropy definition that is inconsistent both mathematically and thermodynamically."

Consistent thermostatistics forbids negative absolute temperatures

Fake temperatures, Fake masses etc are almost always linked to strange interpretations of quasi-distributions.

luckily Fake temperatures cannot exist! Not even in Hell! So please dont worry about < 0 Kelvin. And I am quite sure also no temperature above the Planck temperature, it is impossible!

I can guarantee the temperature in Hell must be in the range

\(0\leq T \leq T_p \)

so nothing to be surprised or scared off there.

Statistics: Posted by Collector — April 8th, 2018, 6:04 pm

]]>

Never mix your colours!

Statistics: Posted by Cuchulainn — April 4th, 2018, 4:42 pm

]]>

Statistics: Posted by Collector — April 4th, 2018, 3:52 pm

]]>

Statistics: Posted by Cuchulainn — April 4th, 2018, 1:59 pm

]]>

The one below is RGB, the one above is CMYK, can anyone see difference in the colors? well think CMYK worked well on W.

my v max formula leads to a maximum quantum probability of exactly one! Very interestingly it also looks like I am getting a probability-gap, the smallest probability above zero, when looking for mass or energy.

Statistics: Posted by Collector — April 4th, 2018, 6:59 am

]]>

In software development we see analogous stories:

Statistics: Posted by Cuchulainn — April 3rd, 2018, 10:22 am

]]>

Statistics: Posted by Collector — April 3rd, 2018, 9:52 am

]]>

Statistics: Posted by Cuchulainn — April 3rd, 2018, 9:09 am

]]>

I was too positive, but yes in finance we can understand exactly why they show up in some models, and the solution is to choose models without them, adjust input-parameters such as numbers of time-steps etc to remove negative probabilities. In physics they invented all kind of crap fake interpretations about reality to save their fake probabilities:

[/i]

why are several finance quants often referring to physics as being much more sound than quant finance?

We are in the magic-mystical age of quantum physics that at some point should be replaced with science and logic? Very advanced curve fitting, no matter how well predictions it gives is not deep science (and I bet it all breaks at the Planck scale)!

"String theory and string cosmology

"

Assume we can trust the Swedes (??), what do you go for Chuh, evil-strings or fake-negative probabilities?

If one are in the middle of a dark age will one notice it before one are out of the darkness?

Statistics: Posted by Collector — April 1st, 2018, 6:09 pm

]]>

http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/do ... 1&type=pdf

Statistics: Posted by Cuchulainn — April 1st, 2018, 10:56 am

]]>

No one has proved that negative probabilities exist. So trying to use them is pointless.

The model is probably not 100% correct.

"The model is probably not 100% correct." Yes this is nice way (normally also my political correct way) of saying something is wrong! Here very wrong and Fake!

Lets forget political correctness! Their models are wrong!

Statistics: Posted by Collector — March 31st, 2018, 11:16 am

]]>