HahahaThat's not Primary school, ..maybe pre-school?The one expressed at the first message of this topic, page 1.What brainteaser/exercise?

- September 11th, 2017, 10:06 am
- Forum: Brainteaser Forum
- Topic: True or false
- Replies:
**35** - Views:
**18020**

HahahaThat's not Primary school, ..maybe pre-school?The one expressed at the first message of this topic, page 1.What brainteaser/exercise?

- September 11th, 2017, 8:38 am
- Forum: Brainteaser Forum
- Topic: True or false
- Replies:
**35** - Views:
**18020**

Was there a big mirror on the wall when you did this test ? I'll not answer to this stupidity, but just the "throw 6". It is clear that your link with the dice is meaningless, because, in the considered brainteaser, the event for one question is 'this is true', not 'power of two'. If you'd be able ...

- September 11th, 2017, 7:22 am
- Forum: Brainteaser Forum
- Topic: The "best" method to compute bivariate cumulative normal distribution
- Replies:
**48** - Views:
**7573**

One requirement is adaptability to other distributions. This looks to mean that any analytics methods considering 'Gaussianity' does not answer the question, so that a numerical method is welcome. I don't see any more general methods but copula or monte-carlo. Good question! The PDE approach I deve...

- September 11th, 2017, 7:21 am
- Forum: Brainteaser Forum
- Topic: True or false
- Replies:
**35** - Views:
**18020**

You're bluffing.They don't care about statistics, they only care about how you react is situations that are I'll posed -like in the real world

- September 11th, 2017, 7:19 am
- Forum: Brainteaser Forum
- Topic: True or false
- Replies:
**35** - Views:
**18020**

Was there a big mirror on the wall when you did this test ? I'll not answer to this stupidity, but just the "throw 6". It is clear that your link with the dice is meaningless, because, in the considered brainteaser, the event for one question is 'this is true', not 'power of two'. If you'd be able ...

- September 10th, 2017, 6:48 pm
- Forum: Brainteaser Forum
- Topic: exp(5) = [$]e^5[$]
- Replies:
**545** - Views:
**122180**

Is a quant a calculation engine?

Very strange question to me...

Very strange question to me...

- September 10th, 2017, 6:47 pm
- Forum: Brainteaser Forum
- Topic: The "best" method to compute bivariate cumulative normal distribution
- Replies:
**48** - Views:
**7573**

One requirement is adaptability to other distributions.

This looks to mean that any analytics methods considering 'Gaussianity' does not answer the question, so that a numerical method is welcome.

I don't see any more general methods but copula or monte-carlo.

This looks to mean that any analytics methods considering 'Gaussianity' does not answer the question, so that a numerical method is welcome.

I don't see any more general methods but copula or monte-carlo.

- September 10th, 2017, 6:37 pm
- Forum: Brainteaser Forum
- Topic: True or false
- Replies:
**35** - Views:
**18020**

This exercice is not clear. Such text must be extremely precise. "with each power of two having an equal probability" This does not mean anything. A number has no probability, but an event, yes. So what does it mean? "and each possible distribution being equally likely for a certain true count" I th...

- September 8th, 2017, 10:26 am
- Forum: Brainteaser Forum
- Topic: Can you motivate this speed difference??
- Replies:
**83** - Views:
**19155**

Ah alright I get what you said.

But watch out from the following point: I think you should consider as many hills as down valleys otherwise the two balls wouldn't be at the same final level, which would be a significant bias, and then no possible comparisons, shouldn't you?

But watch out from the following point: I think you should consider as many hills as down valleys otherwise the two balls wouldn't be at the same final level, which would be a significant bias, and then no possible comparisons, shouldn't you?

- September 8th, 2017, 9:45 am
- Forum: Brainteaser Forum
- Topic: Can you motivate this speed difference??
- Replies:
**83** - Views:
**19155**

Yes but, refer to the video, the ball is faster at the first 'go down-go up' so it doesn't matter.

- September 8th, 2017, 8:49 am
- Forum: Brainteaser Forum
- Topic: Can you motivate this speed difference??
- Replies:
**83** - Views:
**19155**

I want to give another explanation based on the point only, still with no friction. When the point goes down, it gains speed therefore the duration to hit downhill (ie middle of trajectory) is lower than the one to hit middle point if the trajectory was a line. In addition, the only force that (posi...

- September 8th, 2017, 7:28 am
- Forum: Brainteaser Forum
- Topic: Can you motivate this speed difference??
- Replies:
**83** - Views:
**19155**

I give an attempt of intuitive explanation. I neglect any form of friction. We can prove that, using kinetic energy theorem, that it will remain the same for two points. Therefore the speed difference should come from the fact that we have balls and not points. Thus, the rotational effects must be c...

GZIP: On