<t>QuoteOriginally posted by: AlexesDadQuoteOriginally posted by: dirtydroog2Your code absolutely cannot have leaks so you put a 'delete iMember' statement in the dtor.Doesn't even make sense. Even if your smart pointer is a good implementation and has the appropriate conversion operator so that it ...

<t>QuoteOriginally posted by: AlexesDadQuoteOriginally posted by: dirtydroog2You're kidding right, I assumed you'd be intelligent enough to recognise a back-of-envelope snippet from an actual working implementation.I didn't make the mistake of assuming you were intelligent at all.QuoteOriginally pos...

<t>QuoteOriginally posted by: AlexesDadQuoteOriginally posted by: dirtydroog2Which part didn't you understand?You really are serious aren't you ?????Ok. Let's be generous. Maybe you were in a hurry and pre-occupied with other things. Look at your code and try again.Strong Recommendation : Compile an...

<t>QuoteOriginally posted by: AlexesDadQuoteOriginally posted by: dirtydroog2QuoteOriginally posted by: AlexesDadQuoteOriginally posted by: dirtydroog2It's nonsense unless you're writing the most basic of apps.QuoteOriginally posted by: AlexesDadWhat is nonsense ?QuoteOriginally posted by: dirtydroo...

<t>QuoteOriginally posted by: AlexesDadQuoteOriginally posted by: dirtydroog2It's nonsense unless you're writing the most basic of apps.QuoteOriginally posted by: AlexesDadWhat is nonsense ?QuoteOriginally posted by: dirtydroog2"never code delete"dirtydroog2,Maybe you could show us the error of our ...

<t>QuoteOriginally posted by: AlexesDadQuoteOriginally posted by: dirtydroog2Symbian OS, for exampleI think it would be wrong to justify bad programming principles for development in Standard C++ by using Symbian's own version of C++ as a reference. It certainly begs the questions "why was there a n...

QuoteOriginally posted by: AlexesDadfor example ....... ?Symbian OS, for example

<t>QuoteOriginally posted by: AlexesDadQuoteOriginally posted by: CuchulainnYour view is a valid one in the context you are working in. In other areas, raw pointers are mandatory. People have been using them since the 70's (C) Your right. I should have clarified the context I am working in.The conte...

QuoteOriginally posted by: AlexesDadQuoteOriginally posted by: dirtydroog2It's nonsense unless you're writing the most basic of apps.What is nonsense ?"never code delete"

It's nonsense unless you're writing the most basic of apps.

<t>QuoteOriginally posted by: rmaxExactly I thought the history went something like this:US tries to ban RSA from leaving country but saying the RSA cryptography algorithm is the same as exporting weapons from the USGuy that came up with PGP takes a book with the RSA algorithm and PGP outside the US...

<t>QuoteOriginally posted by: kevin08Ok, now we know that deleting string literals via char pointers causes the program to crash. But how about this new example?No no no, this has nothing to do with char*, it will crash for any data type. It crashes because you're trying to delete something that sho...

<t>QuoteOriginally posted by: ErrrbAre there any experts on encryption in this forum? I assume standard linux gpg utility can be easily craked by United States goverment a.k.a Goldman. What are the good available tools for encryption available to frustrated programmers? How long does it take to crac...

<t>QuoteOriginally posted by: CuchulainnQuotebut VB5 is about as popular as Java or C++.Can you back this up? amazing...I never ever hear anyone talk about VB5 since 2002. Maybe I am in the wrong circles. Most kids coming out of the universities want C#. VB5 is dead end. It does not recompile under ...

<t>QuoteOriginally posted by: babu12hi, i am cofused with the this pointer in C++ can someone please help. my understanding is the the "this" pointer contains the address the object of a class. but in most of the cases of function overloadinng we come across situations like1> X& X::memberfunctio...