SERVING THE QUANTITATIVE FINANCE COMMUNITY

 
User avatar
tagoma
Posts: 18233
Joined: February 21st, 2010, 12:58 pm

Re: Grammar Time!

June 30th, 2018, 9:02 pm

Cuchulainn wrote:
bearish wrote:
At least he didn't refer to him as King Salmon.

50% chance?

Whatever
 
User avatar
Cuchulainn
Posts: 56262
Joined: July 16th, 2004, 7:38 am
Location: Amsterdam
Contact:

Re: Grammar Time!

July 1st, 2018, 7:24 pm

George Salmon

Image
 
User avatar
Cuchulainn
Posts: 56262
Joined: July 16th, 2004, 7:38 am
Location: Amsterdam
Contact:

Re: Grammar Time!

July 14th, 2018, 11:21 am

Bill C-16 – No, its Not about Criminalizing Pronoun Misuse
http://sds.utoronto.ca/blog/bill-c-16-n ... un-misuse/
 
User avatar
ppauper
Posts: 67979
Joined: November 15th, 2001, 1:29 pm

Re: Grammar Time!

July 14th, 2018, 5:10 pm

I haven't been following the debate, but wiki suggests that the article cuch linked is inaccurate.
The article says that Peterson said X and X is untrue therefore Peterson is (pick your choice epithet)
The flaw in that argument is that Peterson didn't say X, he said Y, and the article doesn't address Y
From wiki
He stated that his objection to the bill was based on potential free speech implications if the Criminal Code is amended, as he claimed he could then be prosecuted under provincial human rights laws if he refuses to call a transsexual student or faculty member by the individual's preferred pronoun. Furthermore, he argued that the new amendments paired with section 46.3 of the Ontario Human Rights Code would make it possible for employers and organizations to be subject to punishment under the code if any employee or associate says anything that can be construed "directly or indirectly" as offensive, "whether intentionally or unintentionally". Other academics challenged Peterson's interpretation of C-16, while some scholars such as Robert P. George supported Peterson's initiative.


Peterson's argument seems to be that C-16 would have a knock-on effect on PROVINCIAL human rights laws so that misgendering would become a crime under PROVINCIAL human rights laws.
The article just says it wouldn't be a crime under C-16 itself

That article reminds me of NYT fact-checking
 
User avatar
Cuchulainn
Posts: 56262
Joined: July 16th, 2004, 7:38 am
Location: Amsterdam
Contact:

Re: Grammar Time!

July 17th, 2018, 2:36 pm

I noticed there aren’t any commas in your book. Is this your way of cutting back on punctuation noise? Commas are a kind of channel noise. You’re not getting to the verb fast enough. Why make us wait? The comma is on its way out. Use small words. The perfect illustration is a swear phrase: Go to hell! Screw you!

Bart Kosko
Image
 
User avatar
Cuchulainn
Posts: 56262
Joined: July 16th, 2004, 7:38 am
Location: Amsterdam
Contact:

Re: Grammar Time!

July 18th, 2018, 7:18 am

“I don’t see why it wouldn’t be Russia"

Politicians and double negatives.
 
User avatar
Cuchulainn
Posts: 56262
Joined: July 16th, 2004, 7:38 am
Location: Amsterdam
Contact:

Re: Grammar Time!

July 20th, 2018, 9:08 pm

Saw this today

Dogs not allowed on the mountain
Local sheep farmers are exempt.

BTW how do you pronounce
bababadalgharaghtakamminarronnkonnbronntonnerronntuonnthunntrovarrhounawnskawntoohoohoordenenthurnuk!

??/
 
User avatar
ppauper
Posts: 67979
Joined: November 15th, 2001, 1:29 pm

Re: Grammar Time!

July 21st, 2018, 3:59 pm

Cuchulainn wrote:
Saw this today

Dogs not allowed on the mountain
Local sheep farmers are exempt.

BTW how do you pronounce
bababadalgharaghtakamminarronnkonnbronntonnerronntuonnthunntrovarrhounawnskawntoohoohoordenenthurnuk!

??/


did they change Lggbdtttiqqaapp again?

DON'T PANIC: it's only Finnegans Wake - thunderword #1
 
User avatar
ppauper
Posts: 67979
Joined: November 15th, 2001, 1:29 pm

Re: Grammar Time!

July 25th, 2018, 5:43 am

without reading the story, what does this headline mean to you?
Dogs go out of their way to help upset owners, study shows
a) dogs help their owners who are upset
b) dogs help others who are upsetting the dogs' owners
 
User avatar
Cuchulainn
Posts: 56262
Joined: July 16th, 2004, 7:38 am
Location: Amsterdam
Contact:

Re: Grammar Time!

July 25th, 2018, 9:18 am

ppauper wrote:
without reading the story, what does this headline mean to you?
Dogs go out of their way to help upset owners, study shows
a) dogs help their owners who are upset
b) dogs help others who are upsetting the dogs' owners

what about this class of dogs and owners?
Dogs not allowed on the mountain
Local sheep farmers are exempt.
 
User avatar
tagoma
Posts: 18233
Joined: February 21st, 2010, 12:58 pm

Re: Grammar Time!

July 25th, 2018, 12:10 pm

Cuchulainn wrote:
ppauper wrote:
without reading the story, what does this headline mean to you?
Dogs go out of their way to help upset owners, study shows
a) dogs help their owners who are upset
b) dogs help others who are upsetting the dogs' owners

what about this class of dogs and owners?
Dogs not allowed on the mountain
Local sheep farmers are exempt.


In a new study, scientists from Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, US, took 34 dogs and positioned them behind a door which was closed with magnets, with their owners on the other side.


That is in-depth study, robust research methodology
ABOUT WILMOTT

PW by JB

Wilmott.com has been "Serving the Quantitative Finance Community" since 2001. Continued...


JOBS BOARD

JOBS BOARD

Looking for a quant job, risk, algo trading,...? Browse jobs here...