SERVING THE QUANTITATIVE FINANCE COMMUNITY

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 31
 
User avatar
Man
Topic Author
Posts: 1237
Joined: June 27th, 2002, 4:39 pm

Higgs boson - Large Hadron Collider (LHC)

September 7th, 2008, 11:54 pm

When the particles are actually collided, will the Higgs boson be observed?LHC
Last edited by Man on September 7th, 2008, 10:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
User avatar
ppauper
Posts: 70239
Joined: November 15th, 2001, 1:29 pm

Higgs boson - Large Hadron Collider (LHC)

September 8th, 2008, 1:15 pm

more to the point, will the planet still be here ?QuoteProf Otto Rossler, a German chemist who is one of a group of scientists attempting a last-minute court challenge to the project, is especially worried about the creation of black holes.He believes it is possible that the black holes will grow uncontrollably and "eat the planet from the inside".
 
User avatar
rmax
Posts: 6080
Joined: December 8th, 2005, 9:31 am

Higgs boson - Large Hadron Collider (LHC)

September 8th, 2008, 3:13 pm

Planet will still be here (if not the Credit crunch will look like a storm in a tea cup )Higgs Boson will almost be discovered. It will be something like: "We see something that could be the Higgs, but it is the wrong energy, wrong parity or something"
 
User avatar
Traden4Alpha
Posts: 23951
Joined: September 20th, 2002, 8:30 pm

Higgs boson - Large Hadron Collider (LHC)

September 8th, 2008, 9:42 pm

If a Higgs boson decays in a forest, and no detector is there to observe it, does anyone get a Nobel?The black hole doomsday scenario is almost certainly not going to happen. But given our singular lack of experimental experience with singularities, I think some might be forgiven for being worried that this is one test of theoretical physics that shouldn't be done on Earth.The Drake equation and Fermi paradox have considered the potentially finite lifespan of advanced civilizations but the ET hunters always assumed that war was the likely mechanism for self-extinction. But perhaps cat-killing curiosity and LHC-style physics is the real reason we see no other intelligent life in the galaxy. Any sufficiently advanced civilization will ultimately stumble on to particle physics, make a black hole, and disappear in a gamma ray burst. The fact that an LHC is much cheaper than a self-sustaining presence in outerspace would mean that a civilization would create its blackhole before it creates space colonies far enough from the mother planet to survive the blackhole's formation.
Last edited by Traden4Alpha on September 7th, 2008, 10:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
User avatar
TraderJoe
Posts: 11048
Joined: February 1st, 2005, 11:21 pm

Higgs boson - Large Hadron Collider (LHC)

September 8th, 2008, 10:31 pm

I'll say yes.
 
User avatar
rmax
Posts: 6080
Joined: December 8th, 2005, 9:31 am

Higgs boson - Large Hadron Collider (LHC)

September 9th, 2008, 7:27 am

QuoteOriginally posted by: Traden4AlphaIf a Higgs boson decays in a forest, and no detector is there to observe it, does anyone get a Nobel?The black hole doomsday scenario is almost certainly not going to happen. But given our singular lack of experimental experience with singularities, I think some might be forgiven for being worried that this is one test of theoretical physics that shouldn't be done on Earth.The Drake equation and Fermi paradox have considered the potentially finite lifespan of advanced civilizations but the ET hunters always assumed that war was the likely mechanism for self-extinction. But perhaps cat-killing curiosity and LHC-style physics is the real reason we see no other intelligent life in the galaxy. Any sufficiently advanced civilization will ultimately stumble on to particle physics, make a black hole, and disappear in a gamma ray burst. The fact that an LHC is much cheaper than a self-sustaining presence in outerspace would mean that a civilization would create its blackhole before it creates space colonies far enough from the mother planet to survive the blackhole's formation.Nice bit of logic!I agree the blank-hole is unlikely, but we have never observed Hawking radation, and we all know about Physics knowlege in and around small singularaties and the issues that produces. So it is all very well being confident but....When the switched on the first nuclear pile in the squash they were concerned about thermal runaway and the potential for the core to get so hot it would burn through the planet core "to China" (hence the term China Syndrome) - they even installed a man with an axe to cut the ropes that held the graphite rods to stop the reactor. When they detonated the first atomic bomb, there were similar concerns that the all the oxygen in the atmosphere would burn.
Last edited by rmax on September 8th, 2008, 10:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
User avatar
scholar
Posts: 832
Joined: October 17th, 2001, 8:03 pm

Higgs boson - Large Hadron Collider (LHC)

September 9th, 2008, 12:36 pm

If it has any parity, it is certainly not Higgs, as it is not a boson
 
User avatar
ppauper
Posts: 70239
Joined: November 15th, 2001, 1:29 pm

Higgs boson - Large Hadron Collider (LHC)

September 9th, 2008, 12:53 pm

QuoteOriginally posted by: Traden4AlphaThe black hole doomsday scenario is almost certainly not going to happen. "almost certainly not going to happen" means it's possible but unlikely.Given that you think it's possible, how "almost certain" are you that it won't occur and what is your basis for assigning that probability ?90% certain ?99.99% certain ?
 
User avatar
Traden4Alpha
Posts: 23951
Joined: September 20th, 2002, 8:30 pm

Higgs boson - Large Hadron Collider (LHC)

September 9th, 2008, 1:29 pm

QuoteOriginally posted by: ppauperQuoteOriginally posted by: Traden4AlphaThe black hole doomsday scenario is almost certainly not going to happen. "almost certainly not going to happen" means it's possible but unlikely.Given that you think it's possible, how "almost certain" are you that it won't occur and what is your basis for assigning that probability ?90% certain ?99.99% certain ?That's a very hard problem because we are forced to estimate the chance of an error in what we know based on what we know. I see two approaches:1) Limits of Knowledge: A detailed study of the history of physics could estimate the rate at which prevailing physical theories are proved wrong over time. The rate of turn-over of physical theory (and the age of the constituent theories used to dispel blackhole fears) could be used to estimate the probability that we don't understand blackholes well enough to predict their behavior.2) Cosmological Evidence: What is the natural rate of LHC-class energetic events in or around dense objects and the observed rate of blackholed objects? The fact that none of our solar system's planets has been converted to a blackhole by the incoming bombardment of ultra-high energy cosmic rays suggests we may be safe. Yet this evidence is far from conclusive because the behavior of a near light-speed attogram blackhole in the upper atmosphere may be different from the behavior of a near-stationary attogram blackhole created near a solid metal mass.
Last edited by Traden4Alpha on September 8th, 2008, 10:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
User avatar
Alan
Posts: 9788
Joined: December 19th, 2001, 4:01 am
Location: California
Contact:

Higgs boson - Large Hadron Collider (LHC)

September 9th, 2008, 1:55 pm

So, worst case -- the LHC creates a micro black hole that does not evaporate, and it beginseating the earth. How long do we have? I see Newport Beach is still doing quite nicely at this stage, except for the congestion causedfrom all the immigrants from down-under Also, I predict many excellent parties!
Last edited by Alan on September 8th, 2008, 10:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
User avatar
qhedge
Posts: 136
Joined: November 26th, 2004, 6:14 am

Higgs boson - Large Hadron Collider (LHC)

September 9th, 2008, 2:31 pm

Last edited by qhedge on September 8th, 2008, 10:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
User avatar
TraderJoe
Posts: 11048
Joined: February 1st, 2005, 11:21 pm

Higgs boson - Large Hadron Collider (LHC)

September 9th, 2008, 3:17 pm

Don't listen to Traden4Alpha.The end is nigh, not.
 
User avatar
Traden4Alpha
Posts: 23951
Joined: September 20th, 2002, 8:30 pm

Higgs boson - Large Hadron Collider (LHC)

September 9th, 2008, 3:50 pm

QuoteOriginally written by: Jos Engelen, CERN’s Chief Scientific OfficerThe LHC safety review has shown that the LHC is perfectly safe, it points out that Nature has already conducted the equivalent of about a hundred thousand LHC experimental programmes on Earth – and the planet still exists.”First, this would seem to suggest that the probability of a P(blackhole doomsday) < 99.999% which aren't very good odds considering the impact (6.6 billion dead). In a linear utility space, the expected number of deaths from the LHC is under 66,000 people. Of course, this figure may be optimistic because it assumes that: 1) the "hundred thousand LHC experimental programmes on Earth" figure is correct and 2) none of the mass extinction events in the Earth's history were LHC-like events.Second, we seem to have a case of the fox guarding the henhouse -- those whose careers and life-long goals depend on the LHC are passing judgement on the LHC. Could a physicist actually object to the LHC and expect no social pressures to recant or repercussions from their peers? Shouldn't the recent subprime mortgage mess show us the fundamental limits of regulators/risk managers that aren't wholly independent of the system that they regulate.But I do agree with Alan that the EOE (End-Of-Earth) parties would be fun. Of course the doubling time for the blackhole would need to be at least 10 minutes to give people 24 hours to put together the party.
 
User avatar
Cuchulainn
Posts: 59715
Joined: July 16th, 2004, 7:38 am
Location: Amsterdam
Contact:

Higgs boson - Large Hadron Collider (LHC)

September 9th, 2008, 3:53 pm

QuoteBut I do agree with Alan that the EOE (End-Of-Earth) parties would be fun. Of course the doubling time for the blackhole would need to be at least 10 minutes to give people 24 hours to put together the party. Maybe a fortune teller?
Last edited by Cuchulainn on September 8th, 2008, 10:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
ABOUT WILMOTT

PW by JB

Wilmott.com has been "Serving the Quantitative Finance Community" since 2001. Continued...


Twitter LinkedIn Instagram

JOBS BOARD

JOBS BOARD

Looking for a quant job, risk, algo trading,...? Browse jobs here...


GZIP: On