it depends what people are doing with the phoneWhat about 'phone sex?
worst case would be rectal cancer and probably blunt rectal trauma as well
it depends what people are doing with the phoneWhat about 'phone sex?
Use virgin mobile and you pretty safe!What about 'phone sex?
One of the arguments the California bureaucrats used to not release the report was supposedly due to fear of public panic. I think such unethical stupidity thinking often is used among certain government officials. I don't know if cell phones cause cancer or not, but I know there are plenty of bureaucrats with no clue about risk that cover up information to protect their own ass. Someone should drain out the bureaucrat swamp?
Drain out swamp => all those creepies move onto dry land. Keep the swamp.One of the arguments the California bureaucrats used to not release the report was supposedly due to fear of public panic. I think such unethical stupidity thinking often is used among certain government officials. I don't know if cell phones cause cancer or not, but I know there are plenty of bureaucrats with no clue about risk that cover up information to protect their own ass. Someone should drain out the bureaucrat swamp?
Good point, now we at least know where the swamp is and what creepies we can find there.Drain out swamp => all those creepies move onto dry land. Keep the swamp.One of the arguments the California bureaucrats used to not release the report was supposedly due to fear of public panic. I think such unethical stupidity thinking often is used among certain government officials. I don't know if cell phones cause cancer or not, but I know there are plenty of bureaucrats with no clue about risk that cover up information to protect their own ass. Someone should drain out the bureaucrat swamp?
some things are worth waiting forGood point, now we at least know where the swamp is and what creepies we can find there.Drain out swamp => all those creepies move onto dry land. Keep the swamp.One of the arguments the California bureaucrats used to not release the report was supposedly due to fear of public panic. I think such unethical stupidity thinking often is used among certain government officials. I don't know if cell phones cause cancer or not, but I know there are plenty of bureaucrats with no clue about risk that cover up information to protect their own ass. Someone should drain out the bureaucrat swamp?
and why is it ok for California bureaucrats to cover up cancer risk but not ok for big tobacco to allegedly do the same?One of the arguments the California bureaucrats used to not release the report was supposedly due to fear of public panic. I think such unethical stupidity thinking often is used among certain government officials. I don't know if cell phones cause cancer or not, but I know there are plenty of bureaucrats with no clue about risk that cover up information to protect their own ass. Someone should drain out the bureaucrat swamp?
Have I heard the champagne cork popping? (How much did you pay that schoolgirl?)no drumming for 6 weeks.
I am gonna miss the rhythm the coming weeksHave I heard the champagne cork popping? (How much did you pay that schoolgirl?)no drumming for 6 weeks.
kata makes a good point about the drummingAnother danger is cyclists who do mobile stuff and don't look. a young schoolgirl caused Junior to break his collar bone today.
And yesterday he just finished a studio album; no drumming for 6 weeks.