February 23rd, 2013, 9:45 am
That's all gimmicky crap. It is pure novelty and zero substance.Displaying time has been solved. The culturally ingrained, universally accepted method is the clock face with two or three hands, and to a lesser degree a digital representation. It's a random choice but the choice was made and until somebody comes up with something actually better, why change? Watches are useless anyways and purely exist as jewelry today. A Patek is *worse* at keeping time than a $20 Casio, yet costs a thousand times more. It's not even a technical marvel really: Yes, you have 200 tiny cogs and wheels on a thing around your wrist, great. *I* have a machine the size of a pack of cigarettes that does voice and data transmission over a radio link through a satellite in the sky!It's pretty though.
Last edited by
CrashedMint on February 22nd, 2013, 11:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.