QuoteIn a radio interview Sunday, Princeton University ethics professor Peter Singer argued it is ?reasonable? for government or private insurance companies to deny treatment to severely disabled babies.Singer contended the health-care system under Obamacare should be more overt about rationing and that the country should acknowledge the necessity of ?intentionally ending the lives of severely disabled infants.?Throughout the interview, Singer repeatedly referred to a disabled infant as ?it."

additional physicians join obamacare

QuoteOriginally posted by: ppauperadditional physicians join obamacare With proffessinals like Malachi it can't go wrong. The American enterpuerial spirit.Quote?I am a well rounded proffessional that treats, and cares for patients, using a system of practice that bases treatment of physiological functions and abnormal conditions on natural laws governing the human body. I utilize physiological, psychological, and mechanical methods, such as air, water, light, heat, earth, phototherapy, food and herb therapy, psychotherapy, electrotherapy, physiotherapy, minor and orificial surgery, mechanotherapy, naturopathic corrections and manipulation, and natural methods or modalities, together with natural medicines, natural processed foods, and herbs and nature?s remedies.?Electro and mech therapy looks interesting.Look at the kommas.

Poll: Only 15 percent say they have benefited from ObamaCare

QuoteOriginally posted by: ppauperPoll: Only 15 percent say they have benefited from ObamaCareI wonder what % would say they have benefited from Bush's wars in Afghanistan & Iraq?

QuoteOriginally posted by: Traden4AlphaQuoteOriginally posted by: ppauperPoll: Only 15 percent say they have benefited from ObamaCareI wonder what % would say they have benefited from Bush's wars in Afghanistan & Iraq?you agree with Trump

Obamacare Insurers Are Looking for a Taxpayer Bailout

QuoteOriginally posted by: Traden4AlphaQuoteOriginally posted by: ppauperPoll: Only 15 percent say they have benefited from ObamaCareI wonder what % would say they have benefited from Bush's wars in Afghanistan & Iraq?Hindsight is 20:20. At the time it would have been 'unpatriotic' to utter such thing. Dixie Chicks did.

QuoteOriginally posted by: CuchulainnQuoteOriginally posted by: Traden4AlphaQuoteOriginally posted by: ppauperPoll: Only 15 percent say they have benefited from ObamaCareI wonder what % would say they have benefited from Bush's wars in Afghanistan & Iraq?Hindsight is 20:20. At the time it would have been 'unpatriotic' to utter such thing. Dixie Chicks did.as did pat buchanan and bothose are obama's wars now

US wars are one of the primary reasons of the current financial crisis. It was time when the press published wars' expenses Yugoslavia, Iraq, etc. Billions were spent without any returns and Government needed to cover money evaporation. Obamacare simply took a peace of money from one given them to others. Hundred years ago one paid doctor directly. Now a large number of people are involved that say working on 'hedging' insurance for people.

QuoteOriginally posted by: list1US wars are one of the primary reasons of the current financial crisis. It was time when the press published wars' expenses Yugoslavia, Iraq, etc. Billions were spent without any returns and Government needed to cover money evaporation. Obamacare simply took a peace of money from one given them to others. Hundred years ago one paid doctor directly. Now a large number of people are involved that say working on 'hedging' insurance for people.Any kind of insurance simply takes money from some people and gives it to others. A hundred years ago life expectancy was 30 years.

At the age of 30, maybe :-)It was around 55 (at birth).

QuoteOriginally posted by: EBalQuoteOriginally posted by: list1US wars are one of the primary reasons of the current financial crisis. It was time when the press published wars' expenses Yugoslavia, Iraq, etc. Billions were spent without any returns and Government needed to cover money evaporation. Obamacare simply took a peace of money from one given them to others. Hundred years ago one paid doctor directly. Now a large number of people are involved that say working on 'hedging' insurance for people.Any kind of insurance simply takes money from some people and gives it to others. A hundred years ago life expectancy was 30 years.Indeed! And the most healthcare resources the average person could consume was a low-cost nurse or a couple of hours of doctor time as the person laying dying. There were no $60,000/year chemotherapy drugs, $500,000 MRI machines, $120,000/month ICUs, etc.

Quote There were no $60,000/year chemotherapy drugs,In 1980 there were.

QuoteOriginally posted by: katastrofaAt the age of 30, maybe :-)It was around 55 (at birth).Life expectancyEra Life expectancy at birthin years Life expectancy at older agePaleolithic 33 Based on the data from recent hunter-gatherer populations, it is estimated that at 15, life expectancy was an additional 39 years (total 54), with a 0.60 probability of reaching 15.[11]Neolithic 20 [12]-33 [13] Bronze Age and Iron Age[14] 26 Classical Greece[15] 28 Classical Rome[16] 20?30 If a child survived to age 10, life expectancy was an additional 37.5 years, (total age 47.5 years).[17]Pre-Columbian North America[18] 25?30 Medieval Islamic Caliphate[19] 35+ Average lifespan of scholars was 59?84.3 years in the Middle East[20][21] and 69?75 in Islamic Spain.[22]Late medieval English peerage[23][24] 30 At age 21, life expectancy was an additional 43 years (total age 64).[25] Early Modern England[14] 33?40 1900 world average[26] 31 1950 world average[26] 48 2010 world average[27] 67.2