It seems that Latex does number equations in a depth first manner in nested footnotes. However it doesn't process the nested footnote, at least not in the example below! David Foster Wallace would not approve.
Anyone know how to get that to work?
\documentclass[11pt]{article}
\title{The Meaning of Life}
\author{G. Od}
\begin{document}
\maketitle
\section{What you need to read}
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.
\begin{equation}
-\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m}\frac{\partial^{2} \psi}{\partial x^{2}} + (E-V(x))\psi =0
\end{equation}
Read more here\footnote{All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.
\begin{equation}
E=mc^{2}
\end{equation}
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.
Read even more here\footnote{Blah blah blah Blah blah blah Blah blah blah Blah blah blah
\begin{equation}
\frac{\partial^{2} \phi}{\partial x\partial y}
\end{equation}
blah de blah de blah
}
}
More text. And another equation.
\begin{equation}
\sigma^{2}_{sp}=\sigma^{2}_{A}+\sigma^{2}_{B}-2\sigma_{A}\sigma_{B}\rho
\end{equation}
\end{document}
Apropos of nothing in particular you have made me wonder how latex will number equations in footnotes. Worth a quick experiment...
Collector wrote:Cuchulainn wrote:Rule #1: Always number the pages of your manuscript!
Rule #2: Always number the equations on the numbered pages of your manuscript.