Page 5 of 6

Re: Health hazard of digital sound

Posted: May 17th, 2018, 9:54 am
by katastrofa
It's funny, when I turned up the speakers I could hear both Yenny and Laurel at higher and lower pitch, respectively.

Re: Health hazard of digital sound

Posted: May 17th, 2018, 10:53 am
by ppauper
the UK may follow Norway and turn off FM radio
FM Radio faces Government switch-off as Digital listening passes 50% milestone
I assume it's like digital TV, you need less spectrum to broadcast digital so you can sell the freed-up spectrum to cellphone companies.
I use the 8-track in my car more than the radio anyway

Re: Health hazard of digital sound

Posted: May 17th, 2018, 8:51 pm
by ppauper

Re: Health hazard of digital sound

Posted: May 17th, 2018, 9:39 pm
by Traden4Alpha
I never thought ignorance was fun.

Re: Health hazard of digital sound

Posted: May 17th, 2018, 10:56 pm
by bearish
I never thought ignorance was fun.
Bliss. Not fun.

Re: Health hazard of digital sound

Posted: May 17th, 2018, 11:06 pm
by bearish
I never thought ignorance was fun.
Bliss. Not fun.
Which, in no way, is meant to suggest that Rob Bliss is not fun. His work with Gene Fama on treasury curves is like a barrel of monkeys!
Image

Re: Health hazard of digital sound

Posted: May 18th, 2018, 6:09 am
by ppauper

Re: Health hazard of digital sound

Posted: August 9th, 2018, 5:01 pm
by AlexEro

.....................
It's an advertising trick. Alex knows OT is a religious bunch, so wait for more advertorials. 
.................
Daniel, I am trying to save people here. You called it "advertorials". God will not leave You un-punished for this. Somebody will pay for this - You or your family members. Mark Joshi already paid for his arrogance in CUDA thread, now he is dead.

Re: Health hazard of digital sound

Posted: August 9th, 2018, 5:26 pm
by Cuchulainn
God will not leave You un-punished for this.

Which one? so many to choose from.

"goodnight and may your god go with you"

AlexPro,
No one reads Leviticus anymore.

Re: Health hazard of digital sound

Posted: August 9th, 2018, 5:45 pm
by Paul
...already paid for his arrogance in CUDA thread, now he is dead.
That's setting the bar pretty low for punishment. I think I've done worse things in my life than that. Jesus, I hope I have.

Re: Health hazard of digital sound

Posted: August 9th, 2018, 6:57 pm
by Cuchulainn
On a lighter note, this clock in a famous bar is home to the ashes of a Texan. His name was Billy.

AlexPro, do you have wakes in your area, or is it morose occasion?

Image

Re: Health hazard of digital sound

Posted: August 9th, 2018, 7:34 pm
by Gamal
God will not leave You un-punished for this.

Which one? so many to choose from.
Do you care who hurts you? You should rather care what he does.

Re: Health hazard of digital sound

Posted: August 9th, 2018, 9:26 pm
by AlexEro
____ _____ already paid for his arrogance in CUDA thread, now he is dead.
What a hypocrisy!
The moderator of this forum board removed the name of Mark Joshi here. Of course, "by the name of beloved Mark etc etc.".
Really, guys?
Nobody from his 500 "contacts" from Linkedin, or "friends" cares that his professional Linkedin profile was still active - 10 months after his death.
I have just reported to Linkedin system that this person is dead (with proofs). Nobody here really cares about Mark.
This forum thread is about serious health hazard and about death from it.

Re: Health hazard of digital sound

Posted: August 9th, 2018, 9:36 pm
by katastrofa
Mark Joshi had his family and friends to care for him. We care for minimum decency, just as any normal people. Public accounts of deceased people remain active often for a very long time (rather than wiped out without notice) so that someone can inform their contacts about the circumstances. Poking your nose into that and bringing up his name here was very arrogant and disrespectful.

Re: Health hazard of digital sound

Posted: August 9th, 2018, 9:47 pm
by AlexEro
Mark Joshi had his family and friends to care for him. We care for minimum decency, just as any normal people. Public accounts of deceased people remain active often for a very long time (rather than wiped out without notice) so that someone can inform their contacts about the circumstances. Poking your nose into that and bringing up his name here was very arrogant and disrespectful.
Who are "we"? Wel, well, well, I almost forgot that socialistic "WE", usually proclaimed from communist (or now from the nationalistic ukrainian's) media here and there. It is an old manipulator's trick - use the word "we" to substitute the truth by the illusion of "common opinion".
You can also add here "Your attitude is anti-american!" (C) various New York financial mafias sitting on US television.
What a surprize! The socializm is here AGAIN.