SERVING THE QUANTITATIVE FINANCE COMMUNITY

 
User avatar
arbitraryname
Topic Author
Posts: 6
Joined: April 4th, 2013, 11:36 am

Future prospects of various quant roles

April 5th, 2013, 4:14 pm

What do people think about future prospects of HFT? Of pricing quants? Risk quants? Quant traders? Quant researchers? Quant investment strategists? Quant portfolio managers?Not asking everyone to pitch in on every role, but just wanted to start a thread on this.Just to get "controversial", I'll pitch in my 2 cents, but I really don't know anything about anything:HFT -- Increasing competition, regulatory/political risk -> not so goodPricing quants -- Maybe most of the exciting stuff is already kind of "done"? Don't all the leading banks already have extensive platforms of pricing models? Is there much exciting and rewarding work left here?Risk quants -- Probably good prospects in light of all the regulatory pressure; not sure about the excitement and compensation levels thoughRest -- Don't know, but not sure how investors view quant strategies/funds after all their performance during the crisis, the flash crash, lack of transparency, etc.
 
User avatar
DominicConnor
Posts: 11684
Joined: July 14th, 2002, 3:00 am

Future prospects of various quant roles

April 9th, 2013, 5:12 pm

Be clear the trading is becoming more electronic and automated and the regulators are pushing in that direction, albeit indirectly by mandating use of clearing, etc.Automated execution to avoid moving the market against you when dealing with larger size is commonplace and there are a whole pile of rules around "best execution" that require dealers in effect to execute trades automatically.Also there is a more a "control culture" where the reasons behind a trade are required to be more documented and automation is a good way of doing that.The generates work in market impact modelling and there is a steady growth of quants in what are effectively compliance roles, but whether you see that as good news is a free variable.Scenarios, risk modelling and stress tests mean that many analytics that were "fast enough" for use in the market are too slow when they have to be executed many many times, so there is a lot of re-implementation of exiting models.That is sometimes "risk" other times quant group and sometimes the reading units, varies by bank and business unit.Risk is indeed a growth area in headcount, but I do not yet perceive the money going up to match.
 
User avatar
ArthurDent
Posts: 1166
Joined: July 2nd, 2005, 4:38 pm

Future prospects of various quant roles

April 9th, 2013, 11:32 pm

I can only comment on pricing -10 years back, implementing a term structure model and pricing bespoke exotics was cutting edge.Today, pricing portfolios of vanillas with FVA and CVA is cutting edge - whether CVA/FVA is handled by risk, by the desk or by the CIO's office is open to interpretation!
 
User avatar
alphaalpha
Posts: 18
Joined: October 20th, 2010, 5:14 pm

Future prospects of various quant roles

April 17th, 2013, 10:50 pm

I got some insight recently when interviewing across some of these roles, including risk modeling. The group I talked to does mostly large-scale MC simulations which can actually be quite interesting if you're computationally inclined. As Dominic points out, risk quants spend a fair amount of time these days trying to figure out how to scale up pricing models that worked well for a single desk but are not feasible if you want to price the entire bank's portfolio overnight. The offer I got in risk was actually quite hefty too. High base plus signing bonus but my guess was that performance bonus is likely limited in that role. They seem to realize that it's not the most exciting/attractive area so they're willing to pay up to get good people. This was with a certain BB that lost a big chunk last year in European credit trades and are therefore hiring massively into their risk modeling group right now. Personally, taking quant portfolio manager over risk was a no brainer in the end though since the upside is essentially unlimited while in risk at a BB you'll make MD in 7 - 10 years but you'll still just be a cog with limited bonus potential. Just my 2 cents.
 
User avatar
tu160
Posts: 363
Joined: October 23rd, 2007, 1:14 pm

Future prospects of various quant roles

April 18th, 2013, 12:58 am

QuoteOriginally posted by: alphaalphaPersonally, taking quant portfolio manager over risk was a no brainer in the end though since the upside is essentially unlimited while in risk at a BB you'll make MD in 7 - 10 years but you'll still just be a cog with limited bonus potential. Just my 2 cents.Curios, was the PM role with BB as well or smaller firm? The first position implies heavy C++, how does this fit into PM role?
 
User avatar
DevonFangs
Posts: 3004
Joined: November 9th, 2009, 1:49 pm

Future prospects of various quant roles

April 18th, 2013, 7:14 am

QuoteOriginally posted by: tu160QuoteOriginally posted by: alphaalphaPersonally, taking quant portfolio manager over risk was a no brainer in the end though since the upside is essentially unlimited while in risk at a BB you'll make MD in 7 - 10 years but you'll still just be a cog with limited bonus potential. Just my 2 cents.Curios, was the PM role with BB as well or smaller firm? The first position implies heavy C++, how does this fit into PM role?Might actually not imply heavy C++, just design and leaving the coding to risk IT.
 
User avatar
Gamal
Posts: 2362
Joined: February 26th, 2004, 8:41 am

Future prospects of various quant roles

April 18th, 2013, 7:39 am

QuoteOriginally posted by: DevonFangsMight actually not imply heavy C++, just design and leaving the coding to risk IT.Exactly. One thing in risk is definitely better than in FO - team working. In FO I had to implement all the models myself, as a senior guy I had at most two developers to code in C++ or C# my VBA or criple C++ prototypes. It can't be done this way with massive MC in risk - you have to share and organize the work of many people. And in a bigger team it is easier to find a slot you fit to.
Last edited by Gamal on April 17th, 2013, 10:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
User avatar
alphaalpha
Posts: 18
Joined: October 20th, 2010, 5:14 pm

Future prospects of various quant roles

April 18th, 2013, 11:58 am

QuoteOriginally posted by: tu160QuoteOriginally posted by: alphaalphaPersonally, taking quant portfolio manager over risk was a no brainer in the end though since the upside is essentially unlimited while in risk at a BB you'll make MD in 7 - 10 years but you'll still just be a cog with limited bonus potential. Just my 2 cents.Curios, was the PM role with BB as well or smaller firm? The first position implies heavy C++, how does this fit into PM role?PM role was with smaller hedge fund, on the high frequency side of things, so pretty heavy on C++ as well.
 
User avatar
tu160
Posts: 363
Joined: October 23rd, 2007, 1:14 pm

Future prospects of various quant roles

April 18th, 2013, 2:53 pm

QuoteOriginally posted by: alphaalphaPM role was with smaller hedge fund, on the high frequency side of things, so pretty heavy on C++ as well.Oh, they start calling it PM now. I guess it sounds better than prop trader
 
User avatar
spice
Posts: 491
Joined: March 22nd, 2006, 11:53 am

Future prospects of various quant roles

April 18th, 2013, 7:18 pm

Quant investment strategists -- it is a small market. I would lump it all with strategists, economists, researchers.
 
User avatar
spice
Posts: 491
Joined: March 22nd, 2006, 11:53 am

Future prospects of various quant roles

April 18th, 2013, 7:18 pm

Quant investment strategists -- it is a small market. I would lump it all with strategists, economists, researchers.
 
User avatar
alphaalpha
Posts: 18
Joined: October 20th, 2010, 5:14 pm

Future prospects of various quant roles

April 19th, 2013, 3:02 am

QuoteOriginally posted by: tu160QuoteOriginally posted by: alphaalphaPM role was with smaller hedge fund, on the high frequency side of things, so pretty heavy on C++ as well.Oh, they start calling it PM now. I guess it sounds better than prop trader Haha, agreed. My impression is that quant strategist, algorithmic trader, PM, portfolio analyst, researcher, etc. is all pretty much the same, especially at smaller firms. If you develop trading strategies, then you also implement them at least to some extent, which means you're trading, except that it's automated so no one's actually a trader in the traditional sense, etc. The specializations might have more meaning at bigger places.
 
User avatar
slacker
Posts: 114
Joined: January 14th, 2006, 12:21 am

Future prospects of various quant roles

April 19th, 2013, 10:18 pm

the term has really always been PM's in hedge funds. Prop trader really is a term for banks.
 
User avatar
tu160
Posts: 363
Joined: October 23rd, 2007, 1:14 pm

Future prospects of various quant roles

April 20th, 2013, 3:21 pm

QuoteOriginally posted by: slackerthe term has really always been PM's in hedge funds. Prop trader really is a term for banks.Interesting... I was working in HF industry for a while, but we had a clear separation between PMs and traders.Could this PM title devaluation be high-frequency specific?
 
User avatar
slacker
Posts: 114
Joined: January 14th, 2006, 12:21 am

Future prospects of various quant roles

April 20th, 2013, 11:05 pm

QuoteOriginally posted by: tu160QuoteOriginally posted by: slackerthe term has really always been PM's in hedge funds. Prop trader really is a term for banks.Interesting... I was working in HF industry for a while, but we had a clear separation between PMs and traders.Could this PM title devaluation be high-frequency specific?Good point. I agree. Trader in Funds usually just meant the execution trader. However, in hi-freq type environment its one and same by my reckoning.
ABOUT WILMOTT

PW by JB

Wilmott.com has been "Serving the Quantitative Finance Community" since 2001. Continued...


Twitter LinkedIn Instagram

JOBS BOARD

JOBS BOARD

Looking for a quant job, risk, algo trading,...? Browse jobs here...


GZIP: On