You mean, like high-school geometry?Can someone explain why this is of any interest at all?!
You mean, like high-school geometry?Can someone explain why this is of any interest at all?!
Is y in degrees, gradians, radians, mils, arc-seconds, revolutions, .... or what?I am still waiting on a solution from Paul and T4A
[$]x^2 = 2[$]OK what about [$]x^2 = 2[$]. Find x.
It's a trick question. Notice the different typeface. So it's just after "Find"I am still waiting on a solution from Paul and T4A
OK what about [$]x^2 = 2[$]. Find x.
Damn! But it's worse than that. There's no EOL character or even a semicolon after the "x" so the find command is still incomplete.It's a trick question. Notice the different typeface. So it's just after "Find"I am still waiting on a solution from Paul and T4A
OK what about [$]x^2 = 2[$]. Find x.
Ah! Back to multiple choice questions!Damn! But it's worse than that. There's no EOL character or even a semicolon after the "x" so the find command is still incomplete.It's a trick question. Notice the different typeface. So it's just after "Find"I am still waiting on a solution from Paul and T4A
OK what about [$]x^2 = 2[$]. Find x.
It is possible to write it using [$]\arcsin[$] if you prefer.Back to primary school for us!
an old jokeDamn! But it's worse than that. There's no EOL character or even a semicolon after the "x" so the find command is still incomplete.It's a trick question. Notice the different typeface. So it's just after "Find"I am still waiting on a solution from Paul and T4A
OK what about [$]x^2 = 2[$]. Find x.
Ppauper already has the best answer for this specific problem as stated by this specific problem poster.Ah! Back to multiple choice questions!Damn! But it's worse than that. There's no EOL character or even a semicolon after the "x" so the find command is still incomplete.It's a trick question. Notice the different typeface. So it's just after "Find"
You are going off on a tangent. Focus.
I like "it's" here.
Sorry!But it took you 5 noisy posts to get this stage.
The problem has nothing to do with units!!! It's a matematical (not engineering) problem that has 0, 1 or many solutions. That's the nub.(read Banach, for example).
Ppauper already has the best answer for this specific problem as stated by this specific problem poster.
How did you get to this conclusion? "best" in what sense? BTW ppauper gave two possible solutions.
Sadly, you have killed this thread before it even got off the ground.