You've got a point there.Kepler certainly worked on floating points.NaM? Not a mortal?Doesn't multiplication by zero kill an immortal?
You've got a point there.Kepler certainly worked on floating points.NaM? Not a mortal?Doesn't multiplication by zero kill an immortal?
Tips 6: The Cross itself is mortal. How would Kepler gather the immortals?Kepler certainly worked on floating points.NaM? Not a mortal?Doesn't multiplication by zero kill an immortal?
Kepler worked with two points but three points were ...You've got a point there.Kepler certainly worked on floating points.NaM? Not a mortal?
Did he encircle them? (Or did he enellipse them?)Tips 6: The Cross itself is mortal. How would Kepler gather the immortals?Kepler certainly worked on floating points.NaM? Not a mortal?
Both so to say! This is why the cross is irrational kind off.Did he encircle them? (Or did he enellipse them?)Tips 6: The Cross itself is mortal. How would Kepler gather the immortals?Kepler certainly worked on floating points.
So then this thread is in the conic section of the forum.Both so to say! This is why the cross is irrational kind off.Did he encircle them? (Or did he enellipse them?)Tips 6: The Cross itself is mortal. How would Kepler gather the immortals?
good point! √12, yes the 12 disciples had to show up somewhere.The average of the cross arms can be rational!
The average of the cross arms is r*(2 + √12). But if r is the product of any rational number and the inverse of that irrational factor, the average will be rational.
That said, at least one of the arms must have irrational length.
Only the tiny immortal spheres exist (they are invariant), other circles (spheres) are not perfect circles (spheres). And this plays a significant role in this quest.In warped space-time, do circles exist?
Do irrationals even exist in the "real" world???? If space is quantized (dare I say atomized), then perhaps all distances are integers.