Yes yes the internet is awesome!
I guess that must the instantaneous watt? E=mc2 tells us there is 100x more energy in that mass. How does that work? (internet free brainstorm while watching expedition Robinson)
The restoring force of the spring counters the gravitational force, methinks.A family that plays together, stays together.And this one: why doesn't the bottom fall?
My guess is it does not have enough kinetic energy. You can put the motion in Lagrange's equation and solve.
Neglecting gravitational effects of nearby wormholes, the ball spends more time in the regions of higher potential energy (hills) than in those of a lower energy (valleys). The energy difference has to go somewhere - into kinetic energy of the ball motion. Friction doesn't play any role. (It's somewhat reminds me of a ponderomotive effect.)Cognition at a distance?Ponderomotive force?
so does a bouncing ball!The restoring force of the spring counters the gravitational force, methinks.A family that plays together, stays together.And this one: why doesn't the bottom fall?
My guess is it does not have enough kinetic energy. You can put the motion in Lagrange's equation and solve.
Neglecting gravitational effects of nearby wormholes, the ball spends more time in the regions of higher potential energy (hills) than in those of a lower energy (valleys). The energy difference has to go somewhere - into kinetic energy of the ball motion. Friction doesn't play any role. (It's somewhat reminds me of a ponderomotive effect.)Cognition at a distance?Ponderomotive force?
It's only natural. Electrons are in charge.I know, but I can't help it. I used to be a solid state physicist and solid state physicists describe electrons as balls. When I left physics, my perspective on this problem has inevitably changed and now every time I see a ball I think it's an electron.
So much negativity, what?It's only natural. Electrons are in charge.I know, but I can't help it. I used to be a solid state physicist and solid state physicists describe electrons as balls. When I left physics, my perspective on this problem has inevitably changed and now every time I see a ball I think it's an electron.
From negativity comes magnetism through an ODE to cathodes.So much negativity, what?It's only natural. Electrons are in charge.I know, but I can't help it. I used to be a solid state physicist and solid state physicists describe electrons as balls. When I left physics, my perspective on this problem has inevitably changed and now every time I see a ball I think it's an electron.
He should stand behind an ion engine for some positive waves.
Sher, man.Like this ion engine?
That's deserve a Patton the back.Sher, man.Like this ion engine?
Always on fire. Heavy mental this is.When you thinks of balls, are they necessarily on fire?