so he messed up that also?The [$]\sqrt 7[$] identity is wrong. The continued fraction should be the golden ratio with the only radical being [$]\sqrt 5[$]. So the two side cannot be equal.
I thought the [$]\ln[$] was a Picassorian touch, what with scrambling the conventional relative position of objects...well supposedly he forgot the ln in front of 2, so they had to add "ln" above the 2 later on, can be seen from the painting kind off.
Now here is a question. What would be the least amount of paint (with or without erasing what is already there) to correct the mistake, and still maintain the original stylistic aesthetics of the painting?And now u say one more error, I need to tell them and ask if they can fix it. this is what happen when one hire painters/artists with no math skills?
or a math-smart painter putting in math errors on purpose? wanting people to think...?
Indeed, you can fill in the blanks with a nested Generative model. First a layer that generates math statements conditioned on the surrounding text , and a second one that paints them like Munch.You are only a few lines of sklearn away from removing the bar yourself !Can you take another picture a little bit more to the left? The bar is occluding the bit between 1/2 and sqrt(pi).