SERVING THE QUANTITATIVE FINANCE COMMUNITY

 
User avatar
Cuchulainn
Posts: 59434
Joined: July 16th, 2004, 7:38 am
Location: Amsterdam
Contact:

Re: exp(5) = [$]e^5[$]

April 22nd, 2018, 12:23 pm

What I'm really saying I suppose: I did not come down in the last shower.
 
User avatar
ISayMoo
Posts: 1898
Joined: September 30th, 2015, 8:30 pm

Re: exp(5) = [$]e^5[$]

April 22nd, 2018, 7:42 pm

I think that you won't get a response unless you challenge them publicly.

I'm not angry, just sad.
What I'm really saying I suppose: I did not come down in the last shower.
I hope that's not an answer you'd give in a live seminar :D
 
User avatar
Cuchulainn
Posts: 59434
Joined: July 16th, 2004, 7:38 am
Location: Amsterdam
Contact:

Re: exp(5) = [$]e^5[$]

April 23rd, 2018, 7:54 am

What I'm really saying I suppose: I did not come down in the last shower.
I hope that's not an answer you'd give in a live seminar :D
Never had a reason to. In speakers, honesty is the best policy. Don't dig yourself into a hole.
 
User avatar
ISayMoo
Posts: 1898
Joined: September 30th, 2015, 8:30 pm

Re: exp(5) = [$]e^5[$]

April 23rd, 2018, 10:31 pm

Sure. What does it have to do with the question whether your answer was relevant? The paper was discussing properties of minimas, not optimisation.
 
User avatar
Cuchulainn
Posts: 59434
Joined: July 16th, 2004, 7:38 am
Location: Amsterdam
Contact:

Re: exp(5) = [$]e^5[$]

April 24th, 2018, 9:33 am

The paper was discussing properties of minimas, not optimisation.
Weird answer.
Not at all; it's about DL-PDE(See the DL-PDE thread). Besides, what is your Venn diagram for the above?

I fear my questions will remain unanswered..
 
User avatar
Cuchulainn
Posts: 59434
Joined: July 16th, 2004, 7:38 am
Location: Amsterdam
Contact:

Re: exp(5) = [$]e^5[$]

June 19th, 2018, 11:52 am

Prove that [$]e[$] is the number that maximises [$]\sqrt[x] {x}[$] for [$]x > 0[$].
 
User avatar
ppauper
Posts: 70239
Joined: November 15th, 2001, 1:29 pm

Re: exp(5) = [$]e^5[$]

June 19th, 2018, 1:19 pm

Prove that [$]e[$] is the number that maximises [$]\sqrt[x] {x}[$] for [$]x > 0[$].
[$]x^ {1/x}=\exp\left[\frac{\log x}{x}\right][$] so ,maximize [$]\frac{\log x}{x}[$] 
 
User avatar
Cuchulainn
Posts: 59434
Joined: July 16th, 2004, 7:38 am
Location: Amsterdam
Contact:

Re: exp(5) = [$]e^5[$]

June 20th, 2018, 6:32 pm

Prove that [$]e[$] is the number that maximises [$]\sqrt[x] {x}[$] for [$]x > 0[$].
[$]x^ {1/x}=\exp\left[\frac{\log x}{x}\right][$] so ,maximize [$]\frac{\log x}{x}[$] 
And if we continue with [$]log x/x < 1 [$] we conclude [$]\sqrt[x] {x} < e [$] for any [$]x>=0[$].

Compare with Steiner's proof in Crelle's journal (overkill?)

http://www2.washjeff.edu/users/mwolterm ... rie/89.pdf

BTW [$]\pi(x) = x/log x[$] is the (conjectured) number of primes that do not exceed x. Collector, are you there?

// The Gozilla number cruncher minimises  [$]- \sqrt[x] {x}[$] as 2.7182818..
 
User avatar
ppauper
Posts: 70239
Joined: November 15th, 2001, 1:29 pm

Re: exp(5) = [$]e^5[$]

June 20th, 2018, 7:12 pm

Compare with Steiner's proof in Crelle's journal (overkill?)

http://www2.washjeff.edu/users/mwolterm ... rie/89.pdf
he does seem to have made a mountain out of a molehill.
 
User avatar
Cuchulainn
Posts: 59434
Joined: July 16th, 2004, 7:38 am
Location: Amsterdam
Contact:

Re: exp(5) = [$]e^5[$]

July 13th, 2018, 1:15 pm

The only solution left is tie solve this problem using (a hand-crafted?) ML algorithm?

Can I just look at the diagram and give the answer? 

Image
[$]e^x[$] is difficult with standard GD (bad answers) but [$]e^{-x}[$] is better. But we see how the learning rate is important.
(using sigmoid here)

Image
 
User avatar
Cuchulainn
Posts: 59434
Joined: July 16th, 2004, 7:38 am
Location: Amsterdam
Contact:

Re: exp(5) = [$]e^5[$]

July 13th, 2018, 1:19 pm

cntd
Image
 
User avatar
ExSan
Posts: 4547
Joined: April 12th, 2003, 10:40 am

Re: exp(5) = [$]e^5[$]

September 16th, 2018, 7:43 pm

π⁴ + π⁵ ≈ e⁶
to seven significant figures

Ref   
Analysis Fact  @AnalysisFact
 
User avatar
Cuchulainn
Posts: 59434
Joined: July 16th, 2004, 7:38 am
Location: Amsterdam
Contact:

Re: exp(5) = [$]e^5[$]

September 16th, 2018, 7:56 pm

π⁴ + π⁵ ≈ e⁶
to seven significant figures

Ref   
Analysis Fact  @AnalysisFact
"Das ist nicht nur nicht richtig; es ist nicht einmal falsch!".
 
User avatar
ppauper
Posts: 70239
Joined: November 15th, 2001, 1:29 pm

Re: exp(5) = [$]e^5[$]

September 16th, 2018, 9:19 pm

π⁴ + π⁵ ≈ e⁶
to seven significant figures

Ref   
Analysis Fact  @AnalysisFact
"Das ist nicht nur nicht richtig; es ist nicht einmal falsch!".
it's true but not necessarily useful. You want [$]e^{5}[$] and this is a formula for [$]e^{6}[$]
Computing [$]\pi^4[$] and [$]\pi^5[$] may be difficult as well
On my machine
[$]\pi^4+\pi^5= 403.4287761[$]
[$]e^6=403.4287935[$]
 
User avatar
Cuchulainn
Posts: 59434
Joined: July 16th, 2004, 7:38 am
Location: Amsterdam
Contact:

Re: exp(5) = [$]e^5[$]

September 17th, 2018, 10:02 pm

Compute [$]e^{\pi}[$] to 2 decimal places with pencil and paper. (Gelfond's constant)

A follow-on from Exsan's post and ansatz (big conjecture but in the right direction) is whether [$]\pi[$] and [$]e[$] are algebraically independent? i.e. is there a polynomial relation

[$]a_{n}\pi^{n} + a_{n-1}\pi^{n-1} + ... + a_{0}\pi^{0} = e^5[$] 

or

[$]a_{n}e^{n} + a_{n-1}e^{n-1} + ... + a_{0}e^{0} = \pi[$] 


where [$]a_{j} , j = 0,..,n[$] are algebraic numbers?

Whichever one takes your fancy.
ABOUT WILMOTT

PW by JB

Wilmott.com has been "Serving the Quantitative Finance Community" since 2001. Continued...


Twitter LinkedIn Instagram

JOBS BOARD

JOBS BOARD

Looking for a quant job, risk, algo trading,...? Browse jobs here...


GZIP: On