ZH is, at best, random... Most of the stuff which I have seen contains glaring, blatant and obvious inaccuracies, some of which, I am convinced, are deliberate. Occasionally. I have seen some insightful articles on ZH, but those are rare. The tone of most of their writing is shrill and annoying and, like I said above, my impression is that ZH would never let actual facts and evidence stand in the way of a "good" story.Overall, ZH, in my view, a waste of time and often worse.
Last edited by Martinghoul
on November 24th, 2015, 11:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.