First, the financial problem was called surplus value problem. Which probably was discovered by Karl Marx. Surplus was not invested in the areas where it comes from. Where it was used is other problem.
confirmed 84-13 by the senate
If Sanders, Warren, Cruz and Paul are all against somebody, I would be strongly in favor of whomever they may be.confirmed 84-13 by the senate
the 13 nays:
Blumenthal (D-CT), Booker (D-NJ), Feinstein (D-CA), Gillibrand (D-NY), Harris (D-CA), Markey (D-MA), Merkley (D-OR), Sanders (I-VT), Warren (D-MA)
along with Ted Cruz (R-TX), Mike Lee (R-UT), Rand Paul (R-KY), Marco Rubio (R, FL)
I believe they were all against Donald Trump during the campaign, which makes you strongly in favor of President TrumpIf Sanders, Warren, Cruz and Paul are all against somebody, I would be strongly in favor of whomever they may be.
The exception that proves the rule...I believe they were all against Donald Trump during the campaign, which makes you strongly in favor of President TrumpIf Sanders, Warren, Cruz and Paul are all against somebody, I would be strongly in favor of whomever they may be.
I don't remember you have shown a single chart from shadowstats.com since Trump took the lead of the country.fed raises rates by a quarter, two more raises expected this year
the economy is booming under President Trump
That would mean that Trump has succeeded in politicizing the fed. Playing around with rates to influence elections would be a gross abuse of power to say the least.Bill Dudley, former president of the NY Fed, has a thoughtful opinion piece on Bloomberg today where he argues that the Fed should not enable Trump’s reckless trade war and that given Trump’s vicious attacks on the institution and its chairman it would be appropriate for the Fed to take into account the impact of their actions on the 2020 election. Not to put too fine a point on it, they should let the economy slide into a recession to make a disastrous Trump reelection less likely.