then it's just as well that they held the one poll that counts when they didBritain would now vote 59-41 to stay in the EU - new poll shows
https://www.rte.ie/news/business/2018/0 ... nion-poll/
You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.then it's just as well that they held the one poll that counts when they didBritain would now vote 59-41 to stay in the EU - new poll shows
https://www.rte.ie/news/business/2018/0 ... nion-poll/
Britain would now vote 59-41 to stay in the EU - new poll shows
https://www.rte.ie/news/business/2018/0 ... nion-poll/
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/p ... 24431.htmlHowever, the poll’s author caveated the findings by saying the interview panel was skewed towards remain and some of those who changed their minds did not take part in the original Brexitreferendum.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... eparationsIf there were to be a second referendum then the Leavers would (let’s just say “should”) destroy the Remoaners in the run-up debates. Leavers have all the Remoaner lies, the Remoaner attempts to derail negotiations, etc. to call on now. Eg there is no single word that has come out of Nick Clegg’s mouth that has turned out to be true. (“There will be no EU army”!)
I think the stronger factor is that Leave voters are afraid to admit their views because of intimidation by angry Remainers.if you're a remainer, you want another poll, and you think that the way to get that is to create the impression that people who voted leave are changing their minds en masse.
So you tell a pollster that you voted leave in the referendum but would vote remain now
It already has. Some once good friends no longer speak to me because they are Remainers. You are the only Remainer who still does! If this counts as speaking.... it would cause a fundamental split in the population which would be extremely destabilizing.