June 23rd, 2004, 10:46 am
QuoteOriginally posted by: tabrisOriginally posted by: wrightyBiased aren't we? Lets go over this again, why do you think the teams looked fairly balanced? Possession time talks good numbers but whats more important is number of shot attempts and shots on target and an often overlooked statistic that favored heavily towards France was corners. These are IMO a good stat to measure "the aggressiveness" of a team. If that means I am watching the wrong game then so be it. It is interesting to me at least that your attribution to France's victory was England's "fault". Don't be surprise, try giving France some credit.Biased - yes.Thought the teams looked fairly balanced as no team out performed. france attacked more because england sat back.I think France can and have been a very good team, this is why I am suprised you say France are back. In my opinion they played well below there potential. I hope they play like that again if we were to meat them....