July 30th, 2004, 5:11 pm
K,This is an interesting topic. People try to tranfer credit risk to market risk. Some firm use risk participant swap (PRS) as a tool. To answer your question, my personal thinking is1. With the liquidity of CDS, it appears that CDS or CDS option is more suitable for this purpose.2. The protection should be target for the average expected exposure or risk equivalent (RQ).3. That depends your goal to against current exposure or RQ or peak exposure.4. Most cases for this kind of swaps, the counter party has a lower rating, or you can not get the netting or collateral in place properly as defined by ISDA master agreement. You would charge the counter-party a higher rate( inclued a cerdit charge). Some firm would reserve a cash for the possible default, which is more expensive. If you buy protecting through CDS or related credit derivative, it should be cheaper than cash reserv.Hope this will help you!E.