Serving the Quantitative Finance Community

 
User avatar
nikki
Topic Author
Posts: 0
Joined: May 5th, 2004, 6:59 am

trinomial tree

August 22nd, 2005, 8:35 pm

I am trying to price callable bond with Hull trinomial tree. But the results i am getting are very dependent of choice of mean-reversion level. For testing purpose, i am using the same example as in Hull book, page 562: 10yr bond, flat 5% yirld curve, sigma=20%, 5%coupon semian., 1.5 yr call option with strike 105. mean reversion a=5%. With these setup, I got almost the same option value (0.67) as in book, but when i change mean reversion to 0.1, the option price is 0.41. Does it reasonable?And the second question is how to adjust tree to unequal time steps?thanks a lot!
 
User avatar
nikki
Topic Author
Posts: 0
Joined: May 5th, 2004, 6:59 am

trinomial tree

August 23rd, 2005, 12:01 pm

can some one give me advise how to solve it, please......
 
User avatar
hammerbacher
Posts: 1
Joined: August 1st, 2005, 8:55 pm

trinomial tree

August 23rd, 2005, 12:21 pm

nikki:i'll address your second question, since i haven't tested the exact params of that tree (but the numbers look fairly reasonable to me). to adjust a tree to unequal time steps, you need to decide if you want to fix the state space (i.e. the values your process can take) or the transition probabilities. I would suggest fixing the former, at least at first, as the process will be easier to understand. If this is the case, then you can just define a set of times t(0), t(1), ..., t(n). Just calculate the transition probabilities at each node according to the regular formulas but with delta_t = t(i) - t(i-1). note that you might get negative values for the transition probs, but that's an issue for another post.Sorry to be brief; if you need more help, let me know.
 
User avatar
nikki
Topic Author
Posts: 0
Joined: May 5th, 2004, 6:59 am

trinomial tree

August 23rd, 2005, 1:19 pm

Thanks a lot for your answer, but unfortunately i can not change state space, my tree constror is not very flexible Can you tell me more about second option? thanks
 
User avatar
hammerbacher
Posts: 1
Joined: August 1st, 2005, 8:55 pm

trinomial tree

August 23rd, 2005, 3:53 pm

my reply is for the case where you cannot change your state space.
 
User avatar
nikki
Topic Author
Posts: 0
Joined: May 5th, 2004, 6:59 am

trinomial tree

August 23rd, 2005, 4:33 pm

what is the second way to do it anyway?thanks
 
User avatar
nikki
Topic Author
Posts: 0
Joined: May 5th, 2004, 6:59 am

trinomial tree

August 23rd, 2005, 5:45 pm

but if we fix state space and change dt, will we still get positive probabilities? thanks
 
User avatar
nikki
Topic Author
Posts: 0
Joined: May 5th, 2004, 6:59 am

trinomial tree

August 24th, 2005, 2:16 pm

excuse my another silly question, how to incorporate time varying volatilities to HW tree?I am reading Schonbucher article "A tree inplementation of a credit spread model for credit derivatives" where he said that jmax >=0.184/(a*dt) is only true when vol is constant. And in case of time dependent vol j max is change at each time step, so probabilities will change too. I thought that probability actually independent from volatility, am i wrong?i really need you help, please.....