August 13th, 2002, 1:39 pm
Hi GreedandFear, You make a good point but do you not think there is more to an MBA than just what you learn? In my opinion, having a maths/quantitative postgrad may be better in terms of the work, although many MBA's do offer quantitative options. (I have got a book on stochastic calculus which is supposed to be an option as part of the Wharton MBA, which is very, very quantitative ).I believe whenever anyone attends an institution, for an MBA, MSc, undergrad, etc. you develop a sort of loyalty for that place and people who come out of that course. For example, someone recruiting from an IB with an MBA from Harvard, will be slightly preferential to candidates from Harvard. You yourself will probably have developed some affinity to the institutions where you did your undergrad and are doing your postgrad degree and will in the future, if recruiting, probably look more favourably on candidates with similar qualifications to yourself. Since, an MBA has been the traditional route into associate level at major companies I feel that candidates with an MBA will be looked upon more favourably since most of the people doing the recruiting will have an MBA. It does boil down to having a qualification simply for the name, but unfortunately this is how it is sometimes.