Serving the Quantitative Finance Community

 
User avatar
wondering
Topic Author
Posts: 0
Joined: June 17th, 2004, 8:10 pm

Estimating delta in MC

February 22nd, 2006, 7:27 pm

I have problem understanding estimating delta using pathwise method and likelihood Ratio method.Suppose option value is C=E[f(x)] where f(x) is payoff function and expectation is taking over density g(x). then delta is dE[f(x)]/ds(0)Delta in pathwise method is E[df(x)/ds(0)]Delta in LR method is E(f(x)*score function] where score = dg(x)/ds(0)/g(x).So basically, pathwise method differentiate payoff function first and then estimate the expected value of the differentiated payoff. LR differentiate density function first and estimate expected value of the product of differentiated log density and original payoff.But I thought both f(x) and g(x) is function of s(0). So when you differentiate E[f(x)] wrt s(0), you have to apply chain rule to f(x)*g(x). You can't differentiate just f(x) or just g(x).
 
User avatar
ericlambi
Posts: 0
Joined: December 10th, 2005, 6:17 am

Estimating delta in MC

February 26th, 2006, 4:01 am

Hmm . . . I only understand about half of your post, but if you want to estimate delta using MC-sim, it is just:[V(S+h)-V(S-h)]/2hIt is best if you use the same random draws as when you calculate V(S) when calculating V(S+h) and V(S-h).
 
User avatar
mj
Posts: 12
Joined: December 20th, 2001, 12:32 pm

Estimating delta in MC

February 26th, 2006, 4:57 am

if you write out the expectation as integral and differentiate under the integral sign you get an expression. if you a change of variables you get another one. that's the difference between pathwise andd likelihood ratio