June 16th, 2006, 1:58 pm
Having gone to a top math grad school, and having compared scores with classmates, I'd have to say that the last two posts are on the money. Nearly all strong applicants have a perfect 800 on the quantitative part of the regular GRE. There is much more variation among applicants in scores on the math subject test, but it doesn't affect admissions that much (unless you've scored particularly low, like in the 50th or 60th percentile)---so it's a plus to have a good score, but it doesn't factor that much against you if you don't have a near-perfect score. Math subject tests (and I presume other subject tests as well) are often sort of a crapshoot, as they often test the quantity of facts you've memorized---which is why, e.g., Americans don't typically do as well on these tests as the Asians who have had these facts drilled into their heads for years! Since they're testing your knowledge of facts, they also don't necessarily serve well as an indicator of one's ability to do good research, which is kind of why they're not valued as much in admissions. By the way, this is for math; I don't know what it's like for OR departments.What is more important? I wouldn't be surprised if most good schools have cutoffs for the quantitative regular GRE and for GPAs. Solid recommendations from respected professors will be the most important thing if you have them, and can trump other mitigating factors.Also, another thing to note is that GRE subject tests are scored on a different scale than the regular GRE, 200-980 instead of 200-800. For the math test, a score of 800 would be pretty good, and a score of 900 would be excellent.
Last edited by
gentinex on June 15th, 2006, 10:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.