August 7th, 2006, 1:17 pm
If a credit hedge fund is very strong at trading distressed names, why should it bother with SCDO equity? Given that idiosyncratic (i.e. distressed trading to a large extent) is the main risk to manage, why incurring lower liquidity and correlation risk found in a SCDO equity versus managing directly a portfolio of single name CDS? I know a number of them do use SCDO equity, but what is their rationale? Limited recourse?