August 26th, 2006, 1:46 pm
The CQF is designed to fit in with having a real job, which rules out many masters programmes.One thing I've observed is a slightly greater chance that your employer will pay for a CQF than a MSc.Obviously I have to declare an interest in the CQF...The ideal thing for you should exist, but doesn't.All the masters level prgrammes seem deficient in programming, either in quality of quantity. There reallyt ought to be a masters in financial programming, (as opposed to computational finance), but if one exists, it is very well hidden.With all due respect, and not knowing you personally, the lowest quality programming teaching from any place with an otherwise good name is at Imperial. One bunch of IC engineers I dealt with a while back had done "Delphi". Yes, really, and no there degree wasn't in Astrology.I'd guess your best bet is to try an undo the damage done at IC, and really put the effort into mastering C++, with a nice soft wooly wrapper of Excel. At the same time you can get your numerical methods up to speed.That would make you a good candidate for a front office quant developer job. At your current job you can make sure you understand how to suck data out of Bloomberg, Reuters et al.