Serving the Quantitative Finance Community

 
User avatar
frontofficequant
Topic Author
Posts: 0
Joined: October 18th, 2006, 12:02 am

Fitting the SVI Parameterization

December 7th, 2006, 4:47 pm

has anyone tried to fit Gatheral's SVI parameterization? If so, have you implemented an algorithm which constrains the implied variacne surface to be a) positive and/or b)arbitrage free
 
User avatar
PaperCut
Posts: 0
Joined: May 14th, 2004, 6:45 pm

Fitting the SVI Parameterization

December 8th, 2006, 2:17 am

QuoteOriginally posted by: frontofficequant has anyone tried to fit Gatheral's SVI parameterization? If so, have you implemented an algorithm which constrains the implied variacne surface to be a) positive and/or b)arbitrage freeWell, yes. But what do you mean? I set it up as vol, not variance, and used Excel Solver. Works like a charm, and Gatheral says it is arbitrage free.
 
User avatar
frontofficequant
Topic Author
Posts: 0
Joined: October 18th, 2006, 12:02 am

Fitting the SVI Parameterization

December 17th, 2006, 3:09 pm

The parameterization is suppose to be fit to variance (the square of vols) since it is the variances which are theoretically asymptotically linear in log-moneyness. It is not gauarenteed to be arb free. There are parameter restrictions to ensure this but they may have to be built into a fitting algorithm. Just wondering if anyone has done this? When I fit I find that I frequently end up with a parameterization that has arb across maturities.
 
User avatar
PaperCut
Posts: 0
Joined: May 14th, 2004, 6:45 pm

Fitting the SVI Parameterization

December 17th, 2006, 4:27 pm

QuoteOriginally posted by: frontofficequantThe parameterization is suppose to be fit to variance (the square of vols) since it is the variances which are theoretically asymptotically linear in log-moneyness. It is not gauarenteed to be arb free. There are parameter restrictions to ensure this but they may have to be built into a fitting algorithm. Just wondering if anyone has done this? When I fit I find that I frequently end up with a parameterization that has arb across maturities.Are you sure? I'm operating from memory here, but I don't think he said anything about arb across maturities. Let me think about this and come back...
 
User avatar
PaperCut
Posts: 0
Joined: May 14th, 2004, 6:45 pm

Fitting the SVI Parameterization

December 17th, 2006, 5:00 pm

QuoteOriginally posted by: PaperCutLet me think about this and come back...On second thought, I've got some other stuff to do. However, I have a feeling you are observing: 1) some subtleties2) "trading," i.e. people are actually taking the bid and hitting the offer on stuff, producing a sense that your parameterization is wrong when it's really just people giving up a little edge here and there.Good luck, bub !