April 7th, 2008, 6:27 pm
If you're interested in derivatives pricing and stochastic calculus, Wharton is easily a top 5 university. To be honest, I don't think your placement will be much better by attending Stanford. I know their placement record is stronger, but this has more to do with the small size of its programme (as has been previously mentioned), which allows them to better market their Ph.D. candidates. In truth, if I had admission to both, I would go to Stanford (but it would not be an immediate choice).I think that both programmes have strong faculty in a broad range of fields. Stanford has a slightly stronger economics department, but it's only marginally better. The finance departments at the two schools are nearly indiscernable. Both schools have strong faculty in asset pricing theory, and strong math/stats departments from which you can learn stochastic calculus.The fact is, if you're a poor performer (in terms of the quality of your research) at either university, you won't get a strong academic placement. If you're a strong researcher, put out a quality market paper, and have the support of your department, you'll get a strong placement. I think the most important thing is to get a good advisor. I'm currently a Ph.D. student in finance at a top school (also focused on asset pricing/financial economics), and your mentor makes all the difference. They'll be the one who introduces you to the people who will hire you (since Wharton likely won't hire its own graduates straight away), they'll be the one to push for you to present at conferences, they'll be the ones with whom you'll have to discuss your ideas. Ask the current Ph.D. students at the two departments about the quality of the mentorship available.Hope this helps.