Dear commonweal & circumfly (excuse me if i'm a little late

), I'm making my master thesis on that argument, maybe a formal definition of stat arb could help you.In their paper "Testing Market Efficiency using Statistical Arbitrage with Applications to Momentum and Value Strategies " Hogan, Jarrow, Teo and Warachka define statistical arbitrage in this way:"[...] statistical arbitrage is a zero initial cost, self-financing trading strategy (x(t) : t ≥0) with cumulative discounted value v(t) [...] statistical arbitrage satisfies four conditions (i) it is a zero initial cost (v(0) = 0)self-financing trading strategy, that in the limit has (ii) positive expected discounted profits, (iii) a probability of a loss converging to zero, and (iv) a time-averaged variance converging to zero if the probability of a loss does not become zero in finite time."It's interesting to see that no one could guarantee that a strategy that today we call stat arb, with the implicit assumption that on the long term the return will be non-negative, tomorrow will not be called a speculation, with the implicit assumption that on the long term the return could be negative

. So the term "arbitrage" is misleading.Two classical stat arb trading strategies are Momentum trading and Pair Trading. There are many reference on those arguments on the web.An user of the forum, msperlin, wrote some good papers on "Pair Trading", and a free downloadable m-script.For more details i recommend you to search the willmott forum with those keywords, you will find some very interesting opinions

.