November 22nd, 2001, 8:31 am
Hmm. Don't forget Itô! I.e. the error must be Taylorexpanded up to the 2nd derivative (as I am sure Omar knows very well). PW is correct, the other is also correct but only if you take that drift minus variance/2. In symbols we have approximately:P(0)*EXP[(mu-sigma^2/2)*dt + sigma*dX] = P(0)*(1+mu*dt + sigma*dX)The drift in the exp-expression must be lower since high error terms sigma*dX has exponentially higher weight than low (negative) error terms. If you calculate the expectation of both sides, using the normal distribution for dX~N(0,dt), the result will be P(0)*Exp[mu*dt]for the Exp-expression andP(0)*(1+mu*dt)for the other one above, which is just the first order Taylor expansion of the former (correct in this case since there is no error term).