Serving the Quantitative Finance Community

 
User avatar
Marriet
Topic Author
Posts: 0
Joined: May 5th, 2008, 9:27 pm

Beta-Adjusted FI RelVal

May 30th, 2008, 8:04 pm

Currently, I am analyzing a FI ReVal trade. The idea is that the spread between two bonds has widened to a record high. I am trying to implement in DV01-neutral basis with a ratio of 10x5 (notional). However, when I regressed the spread over libor/swap against the spread differential between these bonds I found some directionality in this trade. This is, when spread widens the spread differential between these bonds widens too. Since I would like to remove the directionality, I was thinking in a beta adjusted basis. However, I have some doubt about it. If the beta coefficient from the regression is 0.6647 the ratio would be 10x6.4 per notional????I appreciate any comment! Enjoy!
 
User avatar
Marriet
Topic Author
Posts: 0
Joined: May 5th, 2008, 9:27 pm

Beta-Adjusted FI RelVal

June 2nd, 2008, 12:25 pm

I´ll really appreciate any help!
 
User avatar
Martinghoul
Posts: 188
Joined: July 18th, 2006, 5:49 am

Beta-Adjusted FI RelVal

June 2nd, 2008, 12:44 pm

Sounds correct, but impossible to say for sure without looking at the trade in more detail...
 
User avatar
Marriet
Topic Author
Posts: 0
Joined: May 5th, 2008, 9:27 pm

Beta-Adjusted FI RelVal

June 2nd, 2008, 1:21 pm

Thanks for your answer. Regression = 0.66476x – 8.2174. Asset Price Yield Notional 6m Carry DV01DV01 L Bond A 74,50 14,15% 10.000.000 518,0 4.21 S Bond B 82,25 10,13% 5.189.209 146,1 8.12 402 bps 4.810.791 372K 0.51 Beta S Bond A 82,25 10,13% 6.648.000 187K0.66476 402 bps 3.352.000 331K
 
User avatar
jaguaracer
Posts: 0
Joined: January 7th, 2007, 1:12 am

Beta-Adjusted FI RelVal

June 6th, 2008, 12:19 am

Sorry I can't read your output above.To step back a bit, when I look at this stuff, I mostly look at yield differentials so suppose a basic 10yr bond yield % over 7yr bond yield%.So, let's say you have a simple regression says that yield spread between the two is too high and the beta is 0.6647. Then, on a DV01 basis, you would put 10,000 (arbitrary, no resemblance to your 10x5 in your post) DV01 in the Y of your regression and 6,647 DV01 in the X of your regression. This regression weighting will eliminate that directionality.This doesn't get you to notional terms (10m vs 5m or 6.4) but you can back out a notional amount from the DV01 and the specific duration of your bonds.