November 3rd, 2009, 11:05 pm
you mean post-BGM models? i am not sure there are that many. In terms of theory, BGM captures it all nicely, you could see it as a "unified" model of the market. But in practice, BGM is often inadequate due to missing smile calibration or just simply because the quants made it so complicated that it is impossible to calibrate.so my impression is that most people reverted back to the old short rate models, but pimped them up with stochastic volatility.i am not sure how successfull bgm with smile in it would be...it all boils down to how easy it is to calibrate and how stable it can run (by itself) during the lifetime of a deal.