November 16th, 2009, 8:49 am
I do not see any great advantage to switching to a Mac for number crunching.The price performance is always lower and the raw performance is usually lower as well.Macs cost more and use the same chips, but almost always a step behind the leading edge.The other important factors are tool and s/w environment.I'm not aware of any significant tools for scientific computing that are Mac-only, so that is not a reason to switch.If you're more comfortable and productive on a Mac, then you might as well stay there, but I don't see any value for a programmer in moving to the Mac.Macs are really rare in banks outside a few laptops and the people who make brochures for the firm, though a couple of people have told me how much they love Apple screens.My favourite "experience" with Apple was being a director of the one firm in the world that Apple least wanted to look incompetent and malevolent towards.We had to buy some Macs for the graphics people.Apple refused to quote for the hardware.When they heard our name, none of their dealers would sign a maintenance contract.Eventually one of our guys found out why. These Macs would be critical to our business, and we were not a firm that Apple could stiff.So they didn't want our business. Amongst the many issues was that Apple made it difficult on purpose to get spares, apparently people were making "unauthorised" upgrades by putting Apple hardware in Apple computers.The only way to stop that was a Kafkaesque process that ensured that it was actually impossible for any hardware support operation, including Apple itself to actually fix machines in the time they promised.We didn't even ask for extra special short fix times, in fact we had not got that far, and were just looking at the standard terms that Apple themselves set, but chose to make it impossible to deliver.
Last edited by
DominicConnor on November 15th, 2009, 11:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.