October 11th, 2010, 6:03 pm
I can see that the mathematical side of the proof is covered, so i'll give you my two cents regarding the reason a directional move should not benefit a "gamma scalping" strategy.As you know vanilla options have a negative time-decay (yes, i know, except for deep ITM puts with a significant forward points) so in order for you to profit from the option you need to cover the daily decay (by trading the spot against the option). Say you just bought a 1month EURUSD ATM Call (for the sake of the example, let's make it a 50 delta). Hypothetically, you need to sell 50% of the notinal to be hedged against the movement of the spot. Say you sold 50% of the notional (in the spot market) the moment you bought the option (let's make it 1.39), after a day the market went up to 1.4 (let's make it a move to 60Delta). Now you need to sell another 10% of the notional (remember, we are now at 1.4). During these two days you sold 60% of the ntional at an average rate of 1.3917. The total P&L of your strategy after two days is Option (the Mark-to-Market is up by 0.4%) + Delta (you are in loss of 0.5%) = Total loss of 0.1%. Actually, if the price keeps on going up without any downward correction, you will always average a sell price lower than the spot, and will never be able to have gamma profit (this is why directional trades are not very good gamma scalping). You other choice is not to hedge the entire delta, but then you be net long (or short, depends on you position) the underlying asset.Hope the explanation helped a bit.
Last edited by
VolMaster on October 10th, 2010, 10:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.