October 14th, 2010, 7:55 am
QuoteOriginally posted by: DominicConnorThe nature of my work means I've met a good number of people who've enjoyed great sucess in a variety of fields, thoough obviously with a bias towards finance, and I lean mostly towards e) love of the workBut that is balanced by a loathing of the work being done badly, and quite visceral reactions to people they believe as "letting the side down", pretty much regardless of what "the side " is.By answering the question, I'm specifically answering about a grade of sucess that means stuff you do makes the papers and/or your writings on the subject are taken seriously by your peers.They are also approachable because sociopaths who can't interact with people may be able to do quite well, but very rarely make it really to the top tier.I've met any number of dickhead middle managers who mistake aggrression for passion, but they thin out rapidly as you look at higher layers of the pyramid, though their clusting in the first couple of layers of management probably accounts for the understandable view that being shit to people is the way to top management.Very few highly successful people that I've met are monomaniacs, focusing 100% on their work to the detriment of all other things.Most have at least one serious passion, but conversely it is often the case that they are often so protective of it that part of that part of their life you might know them for a a while and never suspect it.Most have a strong desire to teach, though that is typically not in a classroom. Of course what they want to teach is often not what people want to learn, and sometimes is spectacularly useless and/or wrong.Competitive instincts are there of course, but like aggression is has to be modulated since there are very few fields that where the 'star' is actually acting along.I'd agree with most of this, obviously since I seem to be in a similar job role to Dominic.I've however also met guys who are also competitive to a level that they cannot stand not being the star in a team (it may be interpreted by some as immense desire for attention). This motivation drives them forward and when better performers are introduced into the team, they get better as well.