May 5th, 2011, 4:43 pm
Ken, initially it does come across as being a backward step, but there could be mitigating factors. Can you add a bit more context? What type of company is it, where does your current team sit relative to the money, vs where the data team sits. How important is the head of the data team vs the head of your current team, how stable is the company, how political is it, that sort of thing. These are all factors to consider. If you're in a company where it's stable and it's a rite of passage for everyone to do that job, then you have little to lose. If there's any chance that you could end up being stuck, or sidelined from your ultimate goal, then you can politely decline, but you'd also have to look at your prospects if the company is rigid about what they want people to do. I think depending on where you end up, having strong data skills is not a bad thing at all, eg for hedge fund roles where you are required to be an all rounder, but you have to strive to align it to your goals. Another possibility is using it as an opportunity to negotiate for more training and sponsorship. You could ask that they sponsor you to do a part-time masters or CQF (and make sure to have it in writing by email in no unclear terms, not as a vague, spoken promise). Their response will give you the clearest indication of whether or not this has the long term potential to evolve into what you want.
Last edited by
nyasha on May 4th, 2011, 10:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.