February 13th, 2012, 5:13 am
Get yourself a copy of one of these books - is no generally accepted choice for how to determine the relative sizing of each side. I tend to use beta to scale them. This ensures that for a 1% change in the overall market, then both constituents of the pairs trade tend to have corresponding (expected) changes which are equal in value and opposite in direction.eg ABC $2.00 with beta 0.3and XYZ $5.00 with beta 1.5Consider the case that the market moves up 1% then we expect ABC to move up 0.3% and expect XYZ to move up 1.5%. Here we are using 'expect' in the mathematical sense. Using this method we might allocate $100k to ABC (ie buying 50k of them) and short $20k of XYZ (ie selling 4k of them). After this +1% change in the market then ABC will make $300 and XYZ will loose $300. In other words the expected return of the portfolio is zero. This is not the only way to do it but should be reasonably market neutral. Be aware that different people may measure beta using regression over different time frames meaning the number which I calculate for beta may be totally different to yours.Hope that helps.
Last edited by
Stew on February 12th, 2012, 11:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.