Serving the Quantitative Finance Community

 
User avatar
Anton
Posts: 2
Joined: July 11th, 2002, 3:53 pm

Barrier options under jump-diffusions

May 3rd, 2003, 10:45 am

chika, I have tried Kou's version as well, but the results are exactly[\i] the same!actually, I have tested the GS algorithm quite extensively, but it never worked perfectly even for simple function, linear or whatever. what I observed is that initially it converges to the actual value, but then it becomes overflow and diverges. do you get some different behaviour??anton
 
User avatar
chika
Posts: 1
Joined: April 18th, 2003, 2:13 pm

Barrier options under jump-diffusions

May 3rd, 2003, 12:26 pm

>I have tried Kou's version as well, but the results are exactly the same!Nevertheless, I assume that the second term has to be accounted for. You use quite large theta1. Recall that the second root beta2>theta1. In your example theta1=12.6 so that the second term with exp(-beta2*x)<exp(-theta1*x) \sim 0 (x>0). Compare your formula with Kou's one for smaller values of theta and smaller time.I use Stehfest algorithm (Gaver-Stehfest is a modification of it). The algorithm is very reliable and accurate.
Last edited by chika on May 2nd, 2003, 10:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
User avatar
Anton
Posts: 2
Joined: July 11th, 2002, 3:53 pm

Barrier options under jump-diffusions

May 3rd, 2003, 2:18 pm

I use Stehfest algorithm (Gaver-Stehfest is a modification of it). The algorithm is very reliable and accurate.I have only experimented with the Gaver-Stehfest. Can you give me reference or source code for the Stehfest algorithm? I have read the original paper and Stehfest mention such type of problems. regards, Anton
 
User avatar
Alan
Topic Author
Posts: 3050
Joined: December 19th, 2001, 4:01 am
Location: California
Contact:

Barrier options under jump-diffusions

May 4th, 2003, 4:37 pm

Thanks, Anton, for posting your talk, which was informative.With regard to exponential jumps vs. Merton's model, bothyou and Chika like the exponential but your applications are both differentthan mine.I think a good "non-parametric" study is needed if someone hasn'talready done it. If anyone is looking fora good research project, it would be very valuable to take the short-datedoptions of say the SPX, and fit the smile to a jump-diffusion of a verygeneral sort. This general model would have jump-probabilites p_i to be determined for jumps to bins (x_i, x_i+1). The number ofbins could be 10, for example.My guess is that for the SPX, the max. fitted probability would beto a negative bin, ruling out the single or (zero-centered) double exponential. But I am certainly willing to be shown otherwise.Regards,alan
Last edited by Alan on May 3rd, 2003, 10:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
User avatar
newton
Posts: 0
Joined: November 23rd, 2002, 5:46 pm

Barrier options under jump-diffusions

May 7th, 2003, 3:43 pm

If you know the math, you should find the tangent vector bundle for the diffusion at hand. These vectorsare the streamlines (iso-probability lines). Barriers just remove the probabilities between streamlines (waterfalls).Get it?
 
User avatar
chika
Posts: 1
Joined: April 18th, 2003, 2:13 pm

Barrier options under jump-diffusions

May 9th, 2003, 4:36 am

Last edited by chika on May 8th, 2003, 10:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.