Serving the Quantitative Finance Community

 
User avatar
crito2
Topic Author
Posts: 0
Joined: December 1st, 2011, 1:12 pm

rope around the earth

April 30th, 2012, 8:44 am

easy one:Let's say that you have a very long rope which goes all the way around the earth (assumed perfectly circular)Add one meter to that rope.what is the maximum height of a building you could build between that rope and the ground?(use R = 6200km)
 
User avatar
rmax
Posts: 374
Joined: December 8th, 2005, 9:31 am

rope around the earth

April 30th, 2012, 8:47 am

QuoteOriginally posted by: crito2easy one:Let's say that you have a very long rope which goes all the way around the earth (assumed perfectly circular)Add one meter to that rope.what is the maximum height of a building you could build between that rope and the ground?(use R = 6200km)Makes no difference if it is the Earth Sun, or Universe
 
User avatar
crito2
Topic Author
Posts: 0
Joined: December 1st, 2011, 1:12 pm

rope around the earth

April 30th, 2012, 8:55 am

This is not the famous problem for 2nd graders, once u added 1 meter to the rope, the rope is no longer circular:
 
User avatar
samseh
Posts: 0
Joined: October 12th, 2011, 12:46 pm

rope around the earth

April 30th, 2012, 2:21 pm

I would say about 120 m
 
User avatar
AVt
Posts: 90
Joined: December 29th, 2001, 8:23 pm

rope around the earth

May 1st, 2012, 4:38 pm

Hm ... I get h ~ 12.04
Attachments
peaked_rope_around_earth.zip
(29.59 KiB) Downloaded 86 times
 
User avatar
cm27874
Posts: 2
Joined: July 2nd, 2007, 12:10 pm

rope around the earth

May 2nd, 2012, 4:44 am

0.5m; or didn't I get the joke?
 
User avatar
DevonFangs
Posts: 0
Joined: November 9th, 2009, 1:49 pm

rope around the earth

May 2nd, 2012, 8:47 am

QuoteOriginally posted by: cm278740.5m; or didn't I get the joke?Actually my first guess was 0.5m too but that's actually the minimum (if one doesn't want to put the rope on the ground)
Last edited by DevonFangs on May 1st, 2012, 10:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
User avatar
frenchX
Posts: 11
Joined: March 29th, 2010, 6:54 pm

rope around the earth

May 2nd, 2012, 8:47 am

So let's try.R=6200 kmThe perimeter of the Earth is P=2*Pi*R and the new length of the rope is P+0.001 (only 1 m)The figure is totally symmetric so I 'll focus on half the Earth. h is the height of the buildingL is the length of the rope from the top of the building to the tangent point.L²=(R+h)²-R²We need to calculate now the lengh of the remaning rope around the half earth.Let's call A the angle between the radius passing through the building and the one passing through the tangent point.cos(A)=R/(R+h)the complementary angle is then Pi-A and so the remaining rope is (Pi-A)*Rand then the equation is (Pi-arcos(R/(R+h))*R+sqrt((R+h)²-R²)=Pi*R+0.0005or simplified sqrt((R+h)²-R²)=0.0005+arcos(R/(R+h))*RI find something around 120,36 m as Outrun and Samseh said. EDIT : what about if the Earth is an ellipsoid with a flatness of 1/300 ? For simplicity the building would be build at a pole.
Last edited by frenchX on May 1st, 2012, 10:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
User avatar
AVt
Posts: 90
Joined: December 29th, 2001, 8:23 pm

rope around the earth

May 2nd, 2012, 5:50 pm

120 m, agreed - stupid be used km :-(
 
User avatar
frenchX
Posts: 11
Joined: March 29th, 2010, 6:54 pm

rope around the earth

May 3rd, 2012, 7:56 am

What about for the ellipse ? I'll give it a try Rp is the small axis (polar)and Re=Rp*(1+1/300) is the big axis (equatorial)The perimeter is given by the elliptic integral P=4*int(sqrt(Re²*cos(t)^2+Rp²*sin(t)^2),t=0..Pi/2) which can be well approximated by the Ramanujan formula Pi*[3*(Re+Rp)-sqrt((3*Re+Rp)*(Re+3*Rp))]The perimeter is a bit bigger: 39020 km for ellipse compared to 38956 km for the perfect circle.That's where it gets harder and need to calculate a bit before posting.
Last edited by frenchX on May 2nd, 2012, 10:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
User avatar
AVt
Posts: 90
Joined: December 29th, 2001, 8:23 pm

rope around the earth

May 3rd, 2012, 5:55 pm

I did it in a way different form yours (and the others I guess), find it appended,yours is the first solution given there (using Maple's notation and syntax).Roughly one needs a parametrisation in polar coordinates and the according lengthfor that curve (the latter is an [incomplete] elliptic integral, I guess), whilethe according 'radius' then is obvious. Which certainly is known (Mathworld? Classic geometry books?).The radius for the tangent point now is not a constant and the length not linear.Using that instead one will come up with 2 equations to be solved numericallyagain (since numerically elliptic functions are part of major systems that maybe fast). I would say. But have no desire to dig for the above :-)But the puzzling beauty of the 2 questions is already done using circles:Constant distance independent from radius for the 'classical' task and thehuge height for the 'peaked' task (which does not simply result from addingsouth pole and some waist from the equators)
Attachments
rope_around_earth_numerical.zip
(8.82 KiB) Downloaded 80 times