July 10th, 2013, 8:19 pm
Its not so much that each year is unique in itself, but that according to the month of the year the deliverable product will be different. For example, if your crop is harvested once a year between october and december then delivery months october to january probably correspond to product that is delivered ex farm, and other months product that is ex warehouse, so if I buy a future in May with august delivery then my underlying product will be warehoused grain from last harvest, but if I buy for november delivery the underlying product will be product from the upcoming harvest. In terms of futures this means that futures deliverable up until october will correspond to last years grain, and futures deliverable after october to next years grainDepending on anticipated supply and demand, the relative quality of the two harvests and other factors there may be strong market preferences for one or the other.In reality it is a lot more complicated than that, with global suppliers, crops with two harvests per year and (I suspect) feedback mechanisms from crops that are priced basis the future, but the basic concept is that depending on the time of year the nature of the physical supply changes as well as the quantity supplied and this feeds back into the futures.I am not really convinced about absolute price forecasting, but I have known people who were very good at local market volume forecasting (eg Brazilian soybeans, Australian wheat etc), which obviously feeds through into better trading.The ag products I have worked with were all non-US products, so the basis was generally more important than the future - depending on the relative importance of the US underlying vs the real global market it may make more sense to model an overall price level and major supplier basis then back a futures price out of that. Just a thought though, I havent looked into the mechanics of it.