January 11th, 2014, 7:16 pm
You don't mention what academic field of study you are considering, and I think this may play an important role. In finance, trading strategies tend not to be the primary focus, but are more likely to be considered as part of empirical work to test a hypothesis. E.g., you theorize that some market is slow to process a certain kind of information, or that some particular cognitive bias will cause a type of price pattern. If there is statistical support for your theory, you may then proceed to see if it is economically (in addition to statistically) significant, which can be done by devising trading strategies that seek to profit from the theory. The obvious problems with all such research programs are that it is really hard not to build in hindsight bias as well as the fact that one in twenty randomly chosen strategies would be expected to be profitable on a 95% confidence level, and for all the developments in the behavioral finance literature over the last couple of decades, most finance academics will have an intuitive bias in favor or market efficiency. If you consider studying statistics or signal processing (including machine learning, pattern recognition, etc.) you will probably run into fewer philosophical walls, but your advisors may not be particularly interested in or knowledgable about the stock market.