Serving the Quantitative Finance Community

 
User avatar
bluewave
Topic Author
Posts: 2
Joined: February 10th, 2011, 5:30 pm

Size of TUT (Futures Spread) vs STPP/FLAT (ETFs) for 2/10 Yield Curve Trade

July 11th, 2016, 2:07 am

I currently trading 2/10 steepener or flattener using two ETFs: STPP and FLAT.
These ETFs are very illiquid, and I am thinking about switching to futures for the curve trades.

My broker, Interactive Brokers, offers a ticker TUT to trade the 2/10 curve with a face value of $300,000 per contract.
Now I need to find equivalent size of TUT compared to STPP/FLAT ETFs that I am familiar with.

I charted the past performance of TUT and found that it's only about 1/10 of the performance of STPP/FLAT for a same period.
For example, in the past 3 months, STPP moved -7% but TUT only moved -0.7% on the charts.

Does this mean that going long one TUT contract is about the same as going long $30,000 STPP?

Thanks.
 
User avatar
Martinghoul
Posts: 188
Joined: July 18th, 2006, 5:49 am

Re: Size of TUT (Futures Spread) vs STPP/FLAT (ETFs) for 2/10 Yield Curve Trade

July 11th, 2016, 12:38 pm

Firstly, these should help:
http://www.cmegroup.com/trading/interes ... 016-09.pdf
http://www.cmegroup.com/trading/interes ... lator.html

You can thus compute the spread DV01 of each unit of TUT.  I am not sure where you can get this information for the ETFs, but I am sure they will tell you.  Then it's just making sure that you match the DV01s.  Ideally, your empirical calculation should produce something not too dissimilar.
 
User avatar
bluewave
Topic Author
Posts: 2
Joined: February 10th, 2011, 5:30 pm

Re: Size of TUT (Futures Spread) vs STPP/FLAT (ETFs) for 2/10 Yield Curve Trade

July 13th, 2016, 3:20 am

Firstly, these should help:
http://www.cmegroup.com/trading/interes ... 016-09.pdf
http://www.cmegroup.com/trading/interes ... lator.html

You can thus compute the spread DV01 of each unit of TUT.  I am not sure where you can get this information for the ETFs, but I am sure they will tell you.  Then it's just making sure that you match the DV01s.  Ideally, your empirical calculation should produce something not too dissimilar.
Thanks.
I found that TUT's DV01 is about 1/10 of STPP/FLAT.
So I will be using 10 times of the size of STPP/FLAT to replace the exposures.