Tags, you vain thing!
I do vanity searches quite often and find a lot of mugshots signed with my name - none of them is me (once I even found my google generated bio with a stranger face on it). Perfect for me - too many psychos out there.
"If the price of milk falls, ceteris paribus, the quantity of milk demanded will rise."Is there anything more controversial in life than "other things being equal"?
Chimera!"If the price of milk falls, ceteris paribus, the quantity of milk demanded will rise."Is there anything more controversial in life than "other things being equal"?
?
Still time left, luckily for me. The bet is going out Wednesday Nov 2, 2027. I am afraid I will loose by then...Tempting, but there is a much bigger scientific community now sceptical to dark matter, than dark energy. In particular the MOND community is growing
If we define dark energy as the observation that the expansion of the universe is accelerating, I might consider a bet on that vs. dark matter. In other words, you win if the astro-physics consensus becomes "the expansion of the universe is not accelerating" before the consensus turns to "there is no dark matter" or remains at "there is dark matter". I win if the reverse order occurs: the consensus becomes "there is no dark matter" before there is any change (or no change) on the dark energy consensus. And nobody wins if some other combination occurs or we can't agree on the consensus. Say $100 with, say, a five-year time limit?
Dark Matter May Not Exist: These Physicists Favor of a New Theory of Gravity
On other hand I and some others have some more strong cards coming in favour of Lorentz relativistic mass that could make dark energy fall before. So yes I take your bet. Wednesday Nov 2, 2027 we make it up. We are naturally both AAA so no margin collateral.
I could be losing this bet with Espen:
Dark energy 'doesn't exist' so can't be pushing 'lumpy' Universe apart