September 4th, 2006, 5:50 pm
QuoteOriginally posted by: NCuch,The material on 618 & 619 is interesting and relevant. Dirac's general idea was correct, but unfortunately his knowledge of Clifford algebra was poor.What you're interested in is the general solution where the right type of operator splitting is employed.NDirac's splitting was very good but - as can be seen in the book - the formula is left hanging in mid air after the splitting it seems... The current splitting is different in approach from dimensional splitting or corrected operator splitting methods. We just have a product of simpler equations.Don't suppose you know of numerical methods associated with Dirac splitting? I reckon the BCS become a bit easier.
Last edited by
Cuchulainn on September 3rd, 2006, 10:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.