Page 1 of 1
Doing maths with ChatGPT; is it a forgery?
Posted: December 7th, 2023, 11:27 pm
by Cuchulainn
Untouched by human hand?
Early warning -> This solution has gaps. A lot of stylised English, funny symbols for equations e.g. (*), Oxford commas(!), not motivating how you got your formulae.
Are you using LATEX? Are these equations generated by software?
Re: Doing maths with ChatGPT; is it a forgery?
Posted: December 8th, 2023, 3:55 am
by bearish
Windmills! But wait, people in the Netherlands don’t traditionally tilt at them, do they?
Re: Doing maths with ChatGPT; is it a forgery?
Posted: December 8th, 2023, 10:10 am
by Cuchulainn
Windmills! But wait, people in the Netherlands don’t traditionally tilt at them, do they?
It's a worldwide phenomenon.
Kids don't do reeding, riting or rithmatic but they know their Oxford comma.
Re: Doing maths with ChatGPT; is it a forgery?
Posted: January 30th, 2024, 11:33 am
by ExSan
I've requested assistance from ChatGPT several times for help with some non-trivial C language code. Unfortunately, it doesn't consistently provide error-free compilation results.
Re: Doing maths with ChatGPT; is it a forgery?
Posted: January 30th, 2024, 6:56 pm
by Cuchulainn
I've requested assistance from ChatGPT several times for help with some non-trivial C language code. Unfortunately, it doesn't consistently provide error-free compilation results.
It's only human, proof AI thinks like a human.

Re: Doing maths with ChatGPT; is it a forgery?
Posted: May 24th, 2025, 11:18 am
by zebedeem
The first question that I asked Grok was to explain how epidemics grow exponentially so it told me rather than correct me.
Re: Doing maths with ChatGPT; is it a forgery?
Posted: May 25th, 2025, 7:31 am
by jasonbell
I've requested assistance from ChatGPT several times for help with some non-trivial C language code. Unfortunately, it doesn't consistently provide error-free compilation results.
Most of the code models ripped so much Python and Java the others don't do so good.